Talk:Ra.One

Talk:Ra.One
Good articleRa.One has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 7, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
November 13, 2011Good article nomineeListed
March 12, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
April 11, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 13, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 22, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
July 14, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 25, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Source wars

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Raven sir ! IMDB site is used as External link of each film and tv actors and films so if i used it so its not a bad deal. And my brother, Bbfc is too not reliable! Please stop this revert edit & source war by God !! LordMall (talk) 17:03, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

BollywoodHungama too says Hindi to Slumdog Millionaire though thats an English film with Hindi. So this is pure partiality

LordMall (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

IMDB is used only as external link. It is NOT considered a reliable source for facts in the article. I ask you to stop using unreliable sources, stop using parameters in ways they are not supposed to be used, start respecting decisions that have been previously been made, start listening to the comments made by others and start using the talk page instead of the edit war technique you've been using. Go to the reliable source noticeboard and search previous discussions for IMDB. You'll find out there is ONE area that IMDB is considered reliable - screenwriting credits. That's it. As for BBFC - sorry, it's considered reliable. Just to back that up, how about the Bollywoodhungama page on Ra.One? Huh, it says Hindi only as well. And that's also considered a RS. And both are mentioned in the other discussion topics right above this one (and where you easily could have just used that existing topic). I'll give you some credit for using the talk page though. Thanks for that. Ravensfire (talk) 17:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Welcome Raven. But i have to make a point. Thats not my intention for edit war. Neither all users are opposing except you and Kailash! I'm using the talk page coz i have to make my point. Source added to the info not vandalising!!!
LordMall (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Malqrrishh, if you really see yourself as a good editor, then stop adding IMDb as a source. Add anything else reliable, like The Hindu or Times of India. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:46, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Malqrrish, have you read the docs on the {{Infobox film}} template on the use of that parameter? Do you consider English to be primary language of Ra.One? I would note that your "reliable" source says "A few lines" for English (oddly, that's the same for other languages listed that you don't bother to include). Please, tell me what the docs for the infobox template say to put in the language parameter. Ravensfire (talk) 00:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Tamil Wikioedia

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

On Tamil Wikipedia listing the languages given are Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi. --173.55.239.44 (talk) 21:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 170 external links on Ra.One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Ra.One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.