Talk:Query by humming

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"However, it has one major drawback. People can view their peers' recordings which can be very awkward." - What the hell kind of statement is that? Completely opinionated. A re-write of the Midomi entry in a fair, impartial POV would be welcomed. 24.132.30.91 (talk) 20:54, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I changed this sentence:

For the mass public this system means an iPod with a built-in microphone that allows for faster searching through MP3 files.

to this

One example of this would be a system involving a portable media player with a built-in microphone that allows for faster searching through media files.

as it is more neutral and more accurate. I'm pretty sure the idea if not the term preceeded iPods. The first I heard of it was 2 years or more ago I believe where they were suggestion you would call up a number (perhaps on your mobile) and hum the song. Current implementations include pre-existing databases. Indeed, this makes a lot of sense since altho sometimes you may want to find a song you've already got but can't remember the title of, a lot of the time someone might want to find out the name of a song they have heard or have in their head but don't know name of, perhaps so they can put it in their portable media player (altho of course sometimes it may turn out it's already in the player). Also, iPod is obviously not particularly neutral since there are lots of other media devices Nil Einne 12:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC) P.S. looking at the article I see it links to a 1995 article which I guess is the first known published paper on the idea which supports my above view Nil Einne 12:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Query by humming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081221191111/http://mirsystems.info/index.php?id=mirsystems to http://www.midomi.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081221191111/http://mirsystems.info/index.php?id=mirsystems to http://querybyhum.cs.nyu.edu/
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061205203625/http://www.sloud.com:80/technology/query_by_humming/ to http://www.sloud.com/technology/query_by_humming/
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061205015919/http://www.sloud.com:80/ to http://www.sloud.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081221191111/http://mirsystems.info/index.php?id=mirsystems to http://maart.sourceforge.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply