Speedy deletion reason by User:WAS_4.250:
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review prior discussions if you are considering renomination.
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Speedy deletion reason by User:WAS_4.250:
I removed this deletion tag because I don't think an article that has already been AfD'd twice can be subjected to a speedy delete.
Unprovable or not, remember that our criterion is verifiability, not truth. It looks like there is sufficient source material to build a decent article on this concept, regardless of whether such a thing will ever actually be constructed. ~ Booya Bazooka 14:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
I can't believe I'm the only person to have thought of this, but every time I explain it physicists start edging away from me. Quantum sorting is in fact very swift and very simple. All one has to do is randomly rearrange your items to be sorted using some kind of seed derived from an interaction in quantum dynamics (like radioactive decay noise). If the randomly rearranged items are not in order, destroy the universe*. Due to the branching of universes, at least one universe will now exist in which the items are in order. Naturally, as this constitutes original research, for which I undoubtedly deserve some sort of prize, I shall not be adding it to the article.
*Details are left as an exercise for the reader.
This article does not deserve to be on its own, and should be merged into the general sorting article. --DFRussia (talk) 20:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.