Talk:Project Naptha

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Software: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Nanyang Technological University/ Information Technology (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Infobox Web Browser

The infobox web browser serves as a brief summary of the article, giving the readers an insight into the key information of the article’s subject matter. It is especially useful for software products which is being constantly updated. For Project Naptha’s article, the information listed was appropriate and sufficient, allowing readers to obtain the relevant information in a glance.

Structure of Article

The article was well-structured with the use of headers and sub-headers, which allows the reader to easily navigate the page. It also gave the reader a brief overview of the important key issues regarding the topic. The article was written in a neutral tone which was maintained throughout the whole article, with no explicit biasness towards any area of Project Naptha. Their content covered both the positive and negative elements of the topic, giving a reader a thorough read of what they can expect in regards to Project Naptha.

Balanced Coverage

The article was well presented, with significant aspects such as history, application and its disadvantages covered sufficiently. They focused on the basics and further expanded out into the details of what it was about, giving a balanced coverage of the topic. For someone who has little or no knowledge of Project Naptha, we believe that the group’s Wikipedia article would give them a headstart into the introduction of the function and how it could benefit the user.

Citations

Citations is a crucial factor in any wikipedia article as it increases the reliability of the information since readers can easily verify them through the links. The writers have given due credit by provided a substantial list of sources from which they have obtained their information from. However, the writers did seem to miss out citations of certain parts such as history which would make it difficult for the reader to trace the site in which information is obtained from.

Lack of Visual Aids

Visual aids such as diagrams and images are used to help visualise the content of articles and more importantly to support the article’s content. The writers could perhaps have adopted the use of such visual aids under the different sections such as those of “Application”, to enable readers a clearer picture to aid their understanding of the topic.

Preceding unsigned comment added by Qsiow001 (talk) 05:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply