Talk:Programmers Guild

While, for a blip of time, the 'Programmers Guild' article was listed as See also for Outsourcing, the subject of green cards is of importance to the subject of…

Talk:Programmers Guild

Not for Outsourcing see also

While, for a blip of time, the 'Programmers Guild' article was listed as See also for Outsourcing, the subject of green cards is of importance to the subject of outsourcing; this particular trade group may not be, hence the 16:51, 23 January 2022 removal of 'Programmers Guild' seems quite proper. The same edit removed A. Aneesh, an author whose writings on what he calls Algoracy belong in the page about him, if anyplace, not in Outsourcing, per a move of content some time ago.

As for the Programmers Guild article, the original was WP:PROD'd; that expired, and an admin wrote "concern was: WP:PROMO and mostly self published sources about itself, despite having existed for over 20 years." This is an attempt to see if it deserves to be part of Wiki as a matter of history -- but NOT via mention/SpamLink in Outsourcing's See Also. (As for listing their official website in this attempt, if it survives review: that info was part of a cited NYT article).

A copy of the deleted article was available on Aug. 29 '22 at https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/3024644. It credits Wikipedia. I didn't actually look at it until I had searched among NYTimes and done some other basic googles. One of the deleted article's references was worth reading - the register.

WP:OR- so is the Guild pro-immigrant workers or anti? One reading of various items suggests that it's a matter of age. If the worker is 40+ and living legally in the USA, and has a wife and possibly children, then they're pro that person. If the worker is "younger" and seeking to overstay a student visa, 'bye.

As for how did I get to this topic, I was actually looking for something having to do with Caterpillar and found the Outsourcing article mention. A look at action=history found the deletion, and . . . long story longer: I was curious to see if something described by an admin as "having existed for over 20 years" could have also lacked adequate sourcing. Nuts240 (talk) 07:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

What were the skills levels at that time

A 2007 Computerworld article https://www.computerworld.com/article/2541481/the-top-10-dead--or-dying--computer-skills.html (The top 10 dead (or dying) computer skills, Mary Brandel, May 24, 2007) makes it clear that a shift was underway, post-Y2K. The matter of whether COBOL was needed, at that time, might (WP:OR) best be answered by the article's statement "they want to see that on the transcript." How best to integrate this article's content? Not sure. Nuts240 (talk) 08:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Book

Michelle Malkin's Sold Out (book) was co-authored with the Guild's founder. Nuts240 (talk) 01:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.