Talk:Process ontology

This is a list of references that can be used to expand the article.

Talk:Process ontology

Source material

This is a list of references that can be used to expand the article.

  • Process Representation and Planning in Cyc: From Scripts and Scenes to Constraints (2001), by Stuart Aitken
  • Found in Translation (2005), by Danna Voth
    • http://cres.usc.edu/AboutUs/news/x6006.pdf
    • Finding the balance between precision and openness is the special province of language, and scientists are finding new ways to harvest value from emerging languages that strike that balance in new arenas. The international standard ISO 18629 is a process specification language (PSL) that provides clear and concise definitions of information going from one system to another. Leaning on the other end of the balance is the Web Ontology Language (OWL), designed for use on the Semantic Web, which provides more computability than precise definitions.
  • Open Source Business Process Ontology, by Jenz & Partner (c. Protégé beta version 3.0)
    • http://www.bpiresearch.com/Resources/RE_OSSOnt/re_ossont.htm
    • The Business Management Ontology (BMO) brings together business process design, project management, requirements management, and business performance management (in the form of balanced scorecards). As such, it forms the basis for an integrated, vendor-neutral, Business Management Knowledge Base.
  • A process-ontological framework called APT (2001), by Johanna Seibt, Universitet Aarhus, Denmark
    • http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=505199 (needs paid subscription)
    • The paper reports some results of the author's recent work on a process-ontological framework called APT. APT is based on the notion of a free process, a new category in ontology, with Broad's / Sellars' "subjectless" or "pure" processes as their closest cognates. With a pointer to verbal and nominal aspect shift as background motivation I argue that basic classificatory terms of common sense reasoning (activity, event, thing, stuff, property etc.) can be treated as different types of free processes. After introducing essential elements of the formal framework of APT (a non-standard extensional mereology with a non-transitive part-relation) I sketch APT-classifications of basic and complex processes, based on five main descriptive parameters: homomerity pattern, participant structure, dynamic composition, dynamic shape, and dynamic context.
  • Towards a Process Ontology for a model based system for problem solving: the ontology bootstrap problem (2005), by Adriaan(Adrie)J.M. Beulens and Huub Scholten, Wageningen University
  • Mapping Web Services Specifications to Process Ontology, by Jun Shen, Swinburne University of Technology, Yun Yang, Swinburne University of Technology, Bharat Lalwani, Swinburne University of Technology (2004) ($19 plus tax)
  • Beyond Monotonic Inheritance: Towards Semantic Web Process Ontologies (2003), by Abraham Bernstein, Benjamin N. Grosof
  • The Center for Process Studies (2010)
    • http://www.ctr4process.org/
    • The Center for Process Studies (CPS) seeks to promote the common good by means of the relational approach found in process thought. Process metaphysics, in general, seeks to elucidate the developmental nature of reality, emphasizing becoming rather than static existence or being.
  • Physical Emergence and Process Ontology, by William M. Kallfelz (2009)
    • http://www.citeulike.org/article/3812185
    • Alfred North Whitehead introduces in Process and Reality the notion that the philosophy of organism is a cell-theory of actuality. I argue here that the most promising venue for a concordance with process ontology vis-à-vis extant physical theory includes the notions of dynamical and ontological emergence in the physical sciences, as described in Silberstein and McGeever (1999) as well as in Kronz and Tiehen (2002). Here I draw on my previous claims (1997, 2005, 2006) to show in more general terms how process ontology provides a more unified characterization of ontological and dynamical emergence.
  • Design Process Ontology Approach Proposal (c. 2009-2010)
  • Mapping web services specifications to process ontology, by JUN SHEN, YUN YANG, LALWANI Bharat (2004)
  • Modelling the World: A Process-Ontological Approach, by Jari Palomäki, Tampere University of Technology (c. 2005)
    • http://bacon.umcs.lublin.pl/~lukasik/Konferencja%20(teksty%20referatow)/Palomaki.pdf
    • According to Whitehead, the world is a process which is the becoming of actual entities (or actual occasions). They endure only a short time, and they are processes of their own self creation. There are also eternal objects to be understood as conceptual objects. They enter into the actual entity becoming concrete without being actualities themselves. Although novel actual entities are progressively added to the world, there are no new eternal objects. They are the same for all actual entities.
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, the SUPER Links are offline:

"Project IST 026850 SUPER: Business Process Ontology Framework (deliverable 1.1)" (PDF). Information Society Technologies (IST). May 2007. "SUPER Ontologies". Information Society Technologies (IST). 2008 or later. Check date values in: |date= (help) "Project IST 026850 SUPER: Process Ontology Stack, Evolved Version (deliverable 1.5)" (PDF). Information Society Technologies (IST). March 2009.

I dont found any other Reference or Ontology repository, update would be nice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:638:902:200B:75BF:B1BD:46AF:2402 (talk) 14:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.