Talk:Process engineering/Archives/2013

This is from the online OED: "noun

Talk:Process engineering/Archives/2013

poor definition

This is from the online OED: "noun

[mass noun]
the branch of engineering that is concerned with industrial processes, especially continuous ones such as the production of petrochemicals. "

which strikes me as a much better definition than one involving computers

The conflation of process engineering, which has a very wide usage, with process systems engineering, which is only the name of a few engineering departments, further muddies the waters.

I suggest that the definition is changed to something like: "the engineering of industrial processes, especially continuous ones. "

If the articles gets off to this (better) start, then sorting out the rest of the problems will be much easier. (I appreciate that process engineering also extends to batch processes, as well as continuous processes, and this can be explored further with follow-on amendments.) I think this was referred to under the 'wrong area' comment above.

Gravuritas (talk) 21:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposal: split Process Engineering and Process Systems Engineering

At the moment Process Systems Engineering redirects to Process Engineering. The page is pretty small and most of it refers to PSE not PE. I propose that the redirect is removed, so that there are two separate articles. Most of the current stuff can be moved to PSE, which at least will then be accurate. It will leave PE looking pretty bare, but at least we won't have the misleading current situation where the accomplishments for an enormous part of engineering are the minor things quoted. Gravuritas (talk) 00:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.