Talk:Preference voting

The main title of the page on 'instant runoff' could also be preference voting.

Untitled

The main title of the page on 'instant runoff' could also be preference voting.

When people were comparing regular 'runoff' and 'instant runoff', it made sense to call preference voting 'instant runoff'. But now that more people compare approval and preference voting, it makes sense to call preference voting just that. Or you could make the point that when compared to regular runoff it's usually called instant runoff to distinguish it, and when compared to approval it's usually called preference to distinguish it. That doesn't take much space and it doesn't create a system of categorization, which I agree we can avoid.

Or, we could call it "alternate vote". Does that have any secondary meaning? DanKeshet
Seems not. Yes, that name avoids the runoff vs. preference issue, and lets those names be explained properly in comparison to the other types of vote that alternative vote is compared to. Also, that satisfies the requirement of not using overly general names when a more specific one works just as well... and is less overloaded.
Clearly there are other balloting systems where preferences are expressed, e.g. cumulative voting, and also others where the ballot requires some work to interpret but is nonetheless 'instant' in the sense of a single ballot, e.g. Single Transferable Vote. So confusion is inevitable if 'preference' or 'instant runoff' are the distinctions. 'Alternative vote' seems safe to me. - 142

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.