Talk:PostgreSQL
 | PostgreSQL was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 12, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PostgreSQL article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | Revisions succeeding this version of this article is substantially duplicated in one or more external publications. Since these publication(s) copied Wikipedia, rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Upcoming features
Copied from [1] WP:CRYSTAL doesn't apply to the near future (with a set date), at least (notable) movies. [It's a question if next future releases of PostgreSQL is notable..] I guess planned features can be cancelled (at any time?). In case they are in beta I would say including is ok. As the upcoming release (as all are) is open source it is released in some sense (and could be used, but not recommended for production, while testing is ok and recommended). Really all committed code is release (but not notable). Where should we draw the line (believe will end up in next release), beta, release candidate, alpha?.
Initial release of 8 July
I believe this is wrong even though the team celebrated its 12 year birthday that day. Initial release was in 1997. The article itself says this "The first PostgreSQL release formed version 6.0 on January 29, 1997". 213.131.36.174 (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Standards compliance
The standards compliance section says 'PostgreSQL conforms to at least 170 of the 177 mandatory features for SQL:2023 Core conformance", and no other databases fully conformed to it'. However, Mimer SQL seems to support all core features, see https://download.mimer.com/pub/developer/standard/Core-SQL-Feature-Summary.pdf. Or do I misunderstand this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nowthenlater (talk • contribs) 19:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.