Talk:Polygon

Talk:Polygon

"120-gram" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 120-gram and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 8#120-gram until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Can We Add Names for Fake Fractional Polygons?

What's a -gon's name? Or a -gon too? We need the fractional names! Mariomaker-4 (talk) 22:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not the place for publishing or asking about neologisms and original research. And this talk page is not the place for anything other than possible improvements to the polygon article based on published references. You need to look elsewhere for your speculation. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Maybe somewhere else? I didn't mean just on Wikipedia. Mariomaker-4 (talk) 22:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
To repeat: this talk page is not the place for anything other than possible improvements to the polygon article. Other discussion does not belong here. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
A 71319-gon, Schläfli symbol , is one of many 146-grams (the denominator can be any odd number 1<n<73). So what? —Tamfang (talk) 07:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
And your { 12 } is a double cover of a henagon. —Tamfang (talk) 04:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank You! Also, can you make the page for a 146-gon? I don't want it to be a redirect. It's true name, I think, is a Hecatontetracontakaihexagon. I'll get work on the Regular Polygon db of it. It sadly won't be completely finished, but it's okay, right? Mariomaker-4 (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
NO. There is nothing to say about this polygon, specifically, that is not true of polygons in general. It is not notable, in the sense that Wikipedia demands for articles: there are not multiple publications that cover it in-depth, independent of other polygons. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
What if I make a... never mind. I can't even make websites! I'll ask someone else to make the page! Yeah, that's a good idea! Also, for now, it can be a redirect. Okay? I'm very sorry.  :) Mariomaker-4 (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Didn't see my talk edit yet?I would like you to check before long. 219.104.224.225 (talk) 07:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

A polygon does not have to be a plane figure; it can also be three-dimensional (since nothing about a shape made from line segments with endpoints each shared by exactly two segments restricts the shape to two dimensions).

"Enneacontahexagon" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Enneacontahexagon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 4 § Enneacontahexagon until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:21, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

96-gon is also listed with the same discussion. Jay 💬 19:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

"All the 2d shapes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect All the 2d shapes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 4 § All the 2d shapes until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:26, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.