Talk:Physical: 100

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Korea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Reality Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Reality television task force.

The current list names all 100 participants, the vast majority of whom are not notable. Suggest that only those individuals with their own articles are kept, to shorten this excessively long section. Mmberney (talk) 11:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

I suggest to put all 100 participants in wikitable collapsible collapsed style. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️•(🆃🅰🅻🅺) 11:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Have added a collapsible table, as suggested. Mmberney (talk) 12:34, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

However, now the list was destroyed. I listed them all in the correct order. Even though it was probably never mentioned in the show, all the participants had a number. Now, the order is just arbitrary. --Christian140 (talk) 13:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

The controversy section basically has mostly rumors that shouldn't be in wikipedia. One article is cited about alleged steroid use. But the whole article is based on a comment that a twitter user wrote he/she thinks some participants took steroids. But it is just a random online comment everyone can do. There is no notability and nothing to underline the claim. It was just a blind comment. Same goes with the claim that Kim Da-young was a school bully. It was just an anonymous user on Nate bulletin board, who wrote that she knew Kim Da-young and that she was a bully. And some users acgreed. And the author took this post for their article. A big problem nowadays that "news" only write articles about what other people claim online. Also, even if anyone would think this was notable, it would belong in the article Kim Da-young (stunt woman) and not in the article for the show. --Christian140 (talk) 13:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I understand that Wikipedia needs reliable sources, but it literally says on the bottom right of the poster "Revealed January 24" (1월 24일 공개). 58.29.108.12 (talk) 13:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article will be pretty big if it contains both seasons, and since it looks like there'll be a third, it would be even more enormous at that point. So I say let's do an article for each season. The question then becomes what to call them. Season 1 was simply titled Physical: 100 while season 2 was called Physical: 100 Underground and it looks like season 3 is gonna be called Physical: 100 Asia. So should those be the article titles, or Physical: 100 (season 1), Physical: 100 (season 2), and (eventually) Physical: 100 (season 3)?

If Physical: 100 ends up being exclusively about the first season, does there need to be another article for the whole series? What would it be titled?

I'd be happy to write up the second season participants list/quests/etc, just gotta know where to put it. Anonymous Contributor 012786 (talk) 21:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

If we split this article into season articles then the former ones should be the titles per WP:TVSEASON: "Alternatively, if each season is referred to by a distinctive name, that should be used instead." (see also Survivor (American TV series) § Series overview).

If there would be another article for the whole series then it should be Physical: 100 (TV program). 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 06:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

My understanding of that guideline was that it applies to Survivor since the initial season (which of course was simply called Survivor at the time) was later retroactively renamed Survivor: Borneo. Nothing like that has happened for this program. Anonymous Contributor 012786 (talk) 22:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alright for the creation of seasons 1 to 2 and probably 3, then we use the common naming of articles like Physical: 100 season 1, Physical: 100 season 2 and Physical: 100 season 3. And this article will be about the overall of the reality competition series. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 06:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I see the brackets are no longer used in article titles. I think this is the best way. I'll work on it shortly. Anonymous Contributor 012786 (talk) 20:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply