Talk:Photopsin

It seems that the Rhodopsin article has much of the same information and is more complete.

Talk:Photopsin

Untitled

It seems that the Rhodopsin article has much of the same information and is more complete.

Wavelength or frequency?

This article, like all literature on the subject, treats the -opsins in terms of wavelength. But is it wavelength they are sensitive to, or frequency? The law of refraction states that EM frequency remains the same, but wavelength does not, across a transition medium. The frequency of a particular light emitted in vacuum, which crosses into air, and then vitreous humor, is constant. The wavelength is not. --76.217.90.99 01:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

In birds and other animals

The photopsins that exist in humans are not the only ones that exist. Could anyone name the UV-sensitive photopsin that gives birds their tetrachromacy? Are there any infrared-sensitive photopsins? If so, what animals use them? What genes are responsible for producing various photopsins, and what are the precursor chemicals? 71.202.31.63 (talk) 04:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Molecular Structure

Why no mention of the molecular structure?75.129.91.157 (talk) 08:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why does "porphyropsin" redirect here?

Is it a synonym? Equinox 23:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The redirect in non-sense, porphyropsin is rod-opsin with covalently bound 11-cis-retinal-2 while rhodopsin is rod-opsin with covalently bound 11-cis-retinal-1. Two different things, if it all it should redirect to rhodopsin. -- Martin Gühmann (talk) 01:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.