Talk:Peace TV

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indian television (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in May 2012. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Television: Stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Just because someone has appeared on a program does not make them "staff" [1]. The other alleged staff members are not cited at all. Additionally, I'm not clear that most are notable enough to warrant mention (and certainly not in an unencyclopedic list.)Proabivouac 21:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Since you are so keen to help me improve this article, the staff are all mostly on the staff of IRF and Peace TV, but it will take time for me to find which source that is in (feel free to look yourself). Any person listed there that are not directly employed are merely Presenters, and will be moved into the section "Programmes". All I ask is that you assume good faith, or get in and help. John Vandenberg 22:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

This list of programs is uncited, and expressly discouraged by WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a directory.Proabivouac 21:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, while I havent used inline citations for every programme, the table is not OR; the details of programmes is compiled either from the citations already on the article, or from sources I neglected to mention. Please feel free to add {{cn}} on any programme, and I will be happy to find and add the ref.

Regarding NOT, I do not agree with your interpretation of NOTDIR. The table is a synthesis of information that can be used to gain a better understanding of what material is broadcast on Peace TV. It does not provide a "TV Guide"; it is a list of programmes -- what is missing is times and topics. You are free to disagree, but that does not give you the right to repeatedly remove the content while I am developing the article. John Vandenberg 22:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

• Articles in OhmyNews are posted by random volunteer contributors, and (like Wikipedia articles) are not valid sources, and do not establish notability.[2]
• Religious partisan sources such as "The True Call" are not reliable, and do not establish notability.[3]
• Arab News is at least notable, but the (remarkably POV) article is about Israr Ahmed, and only mentions PeaceTV in passing.
• I'd never heard of the Saudi Gazette, but the tone of the article is hardly encouraging.Proabivouac 22:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

OhmyNews and "The True Call" is not being used to establish notability; if you think it fails our notability criteria, please raise an Afd, otherwise leave that argument alone.

The Arab News ref, as with all of the others, is only used to attribute a fact to another source. Where is the problem with this?

wrt Saudi Gazette, please do not disparage things you have not researched. I even did the research for you and created an article so all you had to do was click on the link; its a daily paper that has been in existence for 30 years. John Vandenberg 22:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Jayvdb, you just now created Saudi Gazette using one very dubious source which says nothing about the paper or its notability. Shall you now create International Ulama Conference on Population and Development in order to shore up Saudi Gazette?Proabivouac 03:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, guilty as charged. I create articles. I also created Al-Watan (Kuwait) and Al-Watan (Jordan). I have been meaning to write an article about Saudi Gazette for a while; it has been a redlink on List of Arab newspapers (and its earlier incarnation that I cant find) since early 2006. Saudi Gazette is a notable reliable source. If you dont believe me, nominate it for deletion.

If I think International Ulama Conference on Population and Development is notable, I will create an article about. Please stop being so quarrelsome.

John Vandenberg 03:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The anti-Islam website "Answering Islam" is spam, and is accompanied by a misleading title, as I'd pointed out in this edit summary.[4]Proabivouac 22:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I did not add it; your removal also removed categories; I have now removed the offending link. John Vandenberg 22:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

This is something that has been developing this month (July 2016), so it's subject to change, but the article currently states that Peace TV is banned in the UK, and gives a citation at thehindu.com, which seems to verify the claim. However, I'm in the UK and am currently watching Peace TV on Sky channel 813 (and it's Zakir Naik who is on right now, so it's not a different schedule or agenda or anything). On channel 830 is Peace TV Urdu. So although there is a citation there, the citation is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:6E0B:6B00:B578:53A1:1157:526B (talk) 13:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

We need a reliable source for the 2019 ban, and for the reasons behind it. Please do not re-add it until this is done. Thanks. El_C 06:59, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

PLEASE ADD THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT Peace T.V.:

In 2018 the British communications watchdog, Ofcom, opened six investigations regarding hate speech propagated by Peace TV (see: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cbfe83aa-ed16-11e8-bea1-693d823de728). Peace TV has aired anti-semitism, extreme anti-LBTQ opinions, and has promoted child marriage, FGM and death by stoning for sex outside marriage. (see: https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2018/11/nss-questions-charity-links-to-islamic-tv-channel-under-investigation and

The owner of Peace T.V., Dr. Zakir Naik, was barred from entry into Britain in 2010 because of his support for Osama Bin Laden's terrorist activities. His channel nonetheless continued to broadcast in the UK via Sky services.(see: https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2018/11/nss-questions-charity-links-to-islamic-tv-channel-under-investigation)

Zakir Naik, listed as the chief commentator for Peace T.V., promotes death for those who leave Islam. (see: https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2018/11/nss-questions-charity-links-to-islamic-tv-channel-under-investigation).

Peace TV RebornAthena (talk) 14:07, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Izno (talk) 00:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello all, I just wanted to point out that the website of the station is defunct. While there may be enough coverage (independent/reliable sources) for the TV station, Peace TV Urdu, Peace TV Bangla, Peace TV Chinese and Peace TV Albanian are probably just other-language programs (like the BBC News operating in a foreign language); they can probably be merged into this article, and deleted.Eptalon (talk) 15:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply