Talk:Parallel key

The first part is fine. The section on computing the key signature is totally irrelevant. The section on parallel chord hard to understand and simply wrong. Two

Talk:Parallel key

Corrections needed

The first part is fine. The section on computing the key signature is totally irrelevant. The section on parallel chord hard to understand and simply wrong. Two chords are parallel if they have the same internal intervals, e.g. C and G. These sections should be removed. Marius63 (talk) 13:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Additional citations/Ref improve

Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 08:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tag removed. Hyacinth (talk) 03:51, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Parallel chord (Relative)

The current wording of this will be extremely confusing for any readers from the U.S. I think it needs to be very clear that is derived from Hugo Riemann. In the U.S., a parallel chord would be triads that share the same tonic but have a different mode (P in neo-Riemannian theory). Devin.chaloux (chat) 03:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Why and where is this section confusing? How should it be cleaned up? Hyacinth (talk) 03:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Actually in Swedish for instance parallell minor to 'C major' is 'a minor', where it in English (internationally?) seems to be 'c minor'. That's what is confusing. ~2025-31882-22 (talk) 21:32, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

"In contrast, a major scale and a minor scale that have the same key signature (and therefore different tonics) are called relative keys" it should be C Major and a Minor.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.