Talk:PSPad

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Best editor I ever used! Neftaly 12:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Indeed! So bad it does not have a native-linux version of it, thou. :( Gabriel A. Zorrilla 21:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am about to remove the deletion proposal, as I have found plenty of sources using a search engine. Prods are for un-salvage-able rubbish! T23c 09:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

OK. I have done some work, and I will be back soon to get some external sources. It still needs more work, though. T23c 09:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

An image used in this article, File:PSPad.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 November 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on PSPad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070910223206/http://www.pspad.com/en/pspad.htm to http://www.pspad.com/en/pspad.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.welldonesoft.com/technology/reviews/pspad/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

In the info box there is a link to the Object Pascal page but titled as Delphi. Whilst they are related, they are different. Should the info box be to the Obj Pascal page or the Delphi page? Having the link go to one but titled as the other is very confusing unless the intent is to imply that it is written in Obj Pascal and compiled using Delphi, in which case, why not just say that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattIPv4 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply