Talk:Oracle Data Guard

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Software: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

I replaced "applied" with "shipped" in If the network link connecting primary and standby is over-subscribed, the redo logs are not applied in chronological order. There's a big difference between both concepts.

Advance Data Guard was described lines before. Also, is not a disadvantage, since it provides more features.

Data Guard can manage Hybrid configurations (both OS, platform, and RDBMS version) according to an extent matrix compatibility list. But it can be configured in a Oracle 11.2.0.1 Windows 32 bit primary DB, with a Oracle 11.2.0.3 RHEL 64 bit Logical Standby DB

see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oracle_Data_Guard&diff=236212801&oldid=215317478 I have removed the "howto"-like section. This section was copied from http://www.oracledba.org/10g/dr/10gR2_dataguard_on_Linux.html -- 05:20, 22 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by SDiZ (talk • contribs)

I have removed the list of product placements that re-appears periodically in the "disadvantages" section. There seems to be a minor edit-war between competing alternative products, actually. Frankly, I don't even think Data Guard itself is "notable" (WP:IMPORTANCE), but certainly "substantially cheaper products" are not necessarily worth mentioning based on that criteria alone; and the only reference is a subscription-only Gartner report. I get the feeling that the only purpose of this whole article is so that competing products could promote themselves. So, just for future reference, here's the list of products that periodically pop up under "disadvantages" as "substantially" cheaper alternatives.

Substantial costs savings are possible using Oracle Standard Edition (SE), Oracle Standard Edition One (SE1) or even Oracle Express (XE) with use of a third-party products such as (link removed) AsBase® DataGuard Suite, (link removed) SharePlex for Oracle Database Replication or (link removed) Wisdomforce DatabaseSync for Oracle or (link removed) Dbvisit Standby Database Technology or (link removed) Trivadis TVD-Standby to provide high availability for a database system.

If anyone feels strongly that there is anything more to this than simply a list of links & product placements (i.e., all that is WP:NOT), feel free to discuss here. // Michael (talk|contrib) 10:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC) Reply

Also I just removed another very questionable "disadvantage", also without reference: "version x.x.x.x is somewhat buggy and unreliable". Feel free to add that back, here in the talk page along with a reference, and it certainly would probably be fine to include in the article (as long as there is something to back it up). Again, I just get the feeling that someone is using this page to promote their own competing products. And, if the consensus is that this whole page should be deleted due to not being particularly notable (especially if the goal in creating it in the first place was to promote other products), then so be it. It could simply be a part of Oracle Database page. // Michael (talk|contrib) 10:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC) Reply

It would be nice if this article indicated when DataGuard was introduced to the Oracle DB. 9i? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.225.50.89 (talk) 17:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply