I agree with merging the relevant bits of this article to atmospheric window, but there is content here that wouldn't fit there. The use of 'optical window' in
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I agree with merging the relevant bits of this article to atmospheric window, but there is content here that wouldn't fit there. The use of 'optical window' in the context of tissue optics in medical physics wouldn't be mergeable. If we had a larger article on tissue optics then a merge there would be appropriate, but until we do, we should probably keep at least that part of this article. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 13:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Agreed again - I think this article (and Radio window and Infrared window) should be merged into Atmospheric window. Maybe the best thing would be a new article Window (optics) for the optical component, keeping this page for the medical physics usage at least for the time being, with links to the other uses - roughly as TenOfAllTrades said. I don't mind doing some of this if there's a consensus in that direction. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 20:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
The term optical window is an umbrella term including the "spectral optical window" (UVB, visible and near IR spectrum that passes through the earth's atmosphere), the "technological optical window" (material that allows certain wavelengths to pass) and the "medical optical window" that already has its own page (near-infrared window in biological tissue) and probably should not even be included in this article. So, the way I see it, the page should be split into two parts, the one being the optical window (spectrum) and the other the optical window (optics), because now it is an umbrella article which is quite hard to define or understand; to be honest, it was quite hard for me to understand its content at first... --L'OrfeoGreco (talk) 02:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.