Talk:Operation Carthage
Was no one held responsible for the continued attack on the school ? 24.94.41.117 (talk) 02:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Carthage article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Responsibility
Was no one held responsible for the continued attack on the school ? 24.94.41.117 (talk) 02:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Well there was the Nuremberg Trials Sirhissofloxley (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Sadly, during times of war there is an expectation that accidental damages will occur. It is a war crime if the civilians are intentionally targeted and abused, but unintentional damages are both ethically and legally hard to pin down. The British pilots did not intend to injure civilians, and they undoubtedly suffered from the knowledge of injuring innocent people. 2603:6000:9544:900:1539:99D7:6222:E785 (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Results: British Victory?
The killing of more than one hundred inocent people was a Victory? Just two months before german surronder? WP must have set more higher standard than that... 168.227.97.68 (talk) 06:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- No the mission was to damage the other building and kill Gestapo. Which it did Sirhissofloxley (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
German Soldiers? Or Gestapo?
The details of this article state German soldiers, as well as Danes working for the Germans, plus a few prisoners were killed in the attack. However, my question is - were they German soldiers, or were they Gestapo - Nazi Secret Police. Secret Police are not soldiers. This is not apologia - in fact the Gestapo were an even better target than regular German soldiers... but it seems inaccurate. Scout1026 (talk) 07:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.