Talk:Open outcry

Re replacing open outcry by electronic systems: I have removed reference to Nasdaq. Nasdaq did not replace any open outcry stock exchange. It introduced an elec

Talk:Open outcry

Nasdaq

Re replacing open outcry by electronic systems: I have removed reference to Nasdaq. Nasdaq did not replace any open outcry stock exchange. It introduced an electronic communication system for NASD's market makers to communicate prices. But these guys were not meeting in a a venue before. They were talking to each other on the phone. Cf. difference between order-driven markets (stock exchanges, bourses) and quote-driven markets (e.g. Nasdaq). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Typewritten (talkcontribs) 14:21, 13 April 2006

Minneapolis Grain Exchange

Minneapolis Grain Exchange is no longer on Open outcry as of December 19, 2008. Source: Grain Exchange to Stop Open Outcry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuhrysteve (talkcontribs) 20:12, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rewrite to reflect reality

A lot has changed since the article was first written in the context of a transition to electronic trading. I believe that CME (Chicago) https://www.cmegroup.com/trading-hours.html with the open outcry trading hours described on that page is the only significant exchange globally to use open outcry. My October 2019 review, shows New York, London, Tokyo, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Seoul no longer have open outcry exchanges operating in these cities. Please weigh in here if you are aware of a open outcry exchange other than CME. patsw (talk) 13:31, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.