Talk:Open Services Access

How can one copy this page to a new one called "open services access"? This "architecture" is completely wrong. Thank you -Mark Dmarkdurrett (talk) 13:24, 10 D

Talk:Open Services Access

Untitled

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How can one copy this page to a new one called "open services access"? This "architecture" is completely wrong. Thank you -Mark Dmarkdurrett (talk) 13:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, in a presentation accessible from the ETSI website http://portal.etsi.org/docbox/TISPAN/Open/OSA/default.htm the abbreviation OSA is spelled out as "Open Service Access" (and not Architecture). Does somebody know where the 'official' meaning of OSA can be found? I looked also on 3GPP and Parlay websites: it's always Open Service Access, though I found some publications from third parties that call it Open Service Architecture. If nobody contradicts, I will change the wording in this page (and also the text on the page with the abbreviation OSA).

This definition is wrog. If I have a time I will fix it. Cheers.

I bet this wrong spelling of OSA is a mixture of Open systems architecture and Open Services Access. Could any registered user change it as suggested above?

No it is not. See http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/TSG-WG--C5.htm. The TS 29.198 specification is named "Open Service Architecture (OSA) Application Programming Interface (API) - Part 1", on the other hand the TS 29.198-01 is called "Open Service Access (OSA) Application Programming Interface (API); Part 1: Overview". Maybe Open Service Access handle the application side, and the Open Service Architecture deals with the Gateway part? --- 01 aug 2007, fatso

I found the reason: in 2000 the 3GPP decided to rename "Open Service Architecture" into "Open Service Access". See also the 'pink' note on http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/23127.htm --- 02 aug 2007, fatso

This architecture / access mixup is present in the article, and it makes wierd reading - am fixing it... actually it needs a redirect too. Ooskapenaar (talk) 19:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.