Talk:Open Platform Communications

I don't find the article to be very clear. After reading, I am still not sure what OPC does. Some examples and pictures/diagrams would be useful — Preceding

Talk:Open Platform Communications

Clarity of the article

I don't find the article to be very clear. After reading, I am still not sure what OPC does. Some examples and pictures/diagrams would be useful — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.125.71.178 (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

DDE

I have a little bit confusion in " what is the main difference between the OPC and DDE comunication"? Can any one help me?

For reference you can contact me at "[email protected]".


DDE use clipboard to store data temporarily and retrives on particular interval while OPC is used for realtime processes like handshaking for any query contact me [email protected]

In computing, Dynamic Data Exchange (DDE) is a technology for interprocess communication used in early versions of Microsoft Windows and OS/2. DDE allows programs to manipulate objects provided by other programs, and respond to user actions affecting those objects. DDE was partially superseded by Object Linking and Embedding (OLE), and is currently maintained in Windows systems only for the sake of backward compatibility.

OPC was originally based on OLE, COM, and DCOM, so a different technology stack.

DDE does not rely on the clipboard.

CaliViking (talk) 22:06, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

OPC now Open Process Collaboration?

Hasn't the official meaning of OPC changed to Open Process Collaboration?

That is what Nathan Pocock claimed in the software developer radio show ".NET Rocks" on 2008-08-07 (it is also stated on the associated web page - see the last link below),

 10 m 40 s  -  11 m 50 s:
 MP3 (42 MB):
   <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/netRocksFullMp3Downloads/~5/329570652/dotnetrocks_0357_nathan_pocock.mp3>
     (Short: <http://shrinkster.com/1170>.)
 Home page for the OPC episode:
   <http://www.dotnetrocks.com/default.aspx?showNum=357>


Mortense (talk) 00:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

OPC based SCADA

Does anybody know an OPC based SCADA software which can work on both Windows and Linux? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.182.77 (talk) 10:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

URL/References out of date

The references to opcfoundation.org don't seem to exist anymore. These need some updating — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.254.148.67 (talk) 09:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


Requested move 8 April 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. No challenge in 5 weeks. Cúchullain t/c 16:32, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Reply



OLE for Process ControlOpen Platform Communications – It's the official name since November 2011 and is probably most frequently used by now. FelschR (talk) 09:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

What does OPC stand for?

Well I guess the name of the article is completely wrong. The Source given for the reason of the name "Open Platform Communications" shows a text, where this name is not mentioned once [1]. So it is completely incorrect. The OPC Foundation still doesn't have full name for OPC. It seems to be just three letters with a historical meaning and that's it. --Neto-Zeme (talk)

--- Edit ---

For now they changed it in the source to the name mentioned here. So now this is finally correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neto-Zeme (talkcontribs) 10:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.