Talk:OpenCms

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Change name proposal, the correct name of the project is, as they say in their website, OpenCms --HnZeKtO 30 June 2005 17:01 (UTC)

Is there really only one book published so far documenting this CMS? --

Needs updated

I think it is presumptuous to state that this is one of the most powerful CMS tools. This CMS is more like an aging dinosaur. It does not even support JSR-170 which competing tools such as Magnolia and JBoss Portal do. Both Magnolia and JBoss Portal have more features than OpenCMS and DotNetNuke has the most features by far of just about any CMS but none of these are described as "most powerful". The wikipedia should stick to facts, not opinion and conjecture that simply is a mouth-piece for a particular vendor.

Talk:OpenCms

Needs updated

Content Disclaimer