Talk:Open-source software security
How you can help:
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled
This page was intended to display the pros and cons of open source security from an unbiased view. There is plenty of info that needs to be added to the pros and cons. Also, more metrics and measures need to be added along with other baselines.
The three reasons given as cons to using an Open Source security model all seem to me to be the same reason....many people USING the software doesn't guarantee that many people are improving it. Can't we merge these "three" reasons somehow? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.66.175 (talk) 05:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
Open source software security → Open-source software security — like Open-source software — Neustradamus (✉) 18:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Discussion moved to Talk:List of free and open source software packages#Requested move. Jafeluv (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- That discussion was closed no concensus after 34 days Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Unsourced removed
I removed a bunch of assertions which were unsourced and seemed to just be somebody's opinion. If you want to add any of it back, please source it. --Dissidentplasterer (talk) 14:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.