Talk:One-state solution
.ECR-edit-request-warning { display: none; } Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit requestThis article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict,
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One-state solution article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | The content of Isratin was merged into One-state solution. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
One-state reality should be a redirect to a section in Israeli apartheid rather than here
Right now, "one-state reality" is bolded in the introductory paragraph, but the one-state reality is a framework for understanding the status quo and is not directly related to proposed solutions, such as the one-state solution. The "one-state reality" as described by Michael Barnett (see this article) is that what currently exists in Israel is apartheid and that "what matters is that the apartheid label accurately describes the facts on the ground and offers the beginnings of a road map to change them." The connection that Bennett draws with solutions is specifically that the "one-state reality" is a direct challenge to the Two-state solution because "...this one-state reality contrasts with the illusory idea that there is a democratic Israel, however flawed, that is a distinct entity from the area under its military occupation since 1967."
David Remnick's 2014 New Yorker article (the one currently used in this article) uses the phrase "one-state reality" and refers to the status quo (of 2014). Again, the "one-state reality" is offered as a critique of the two-state solution through quoting several people who dismiss the two-state solution.
So basically, I propose that "One-state reality" is redirected to a newly written section of Israeli apartheid that would explain how scholars have used "One-state reality" to discuss apartheid and critique the two-state solution. JasonMacker (talk) 01:17, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- @JasonMacker, ideally we should have an article called One-state reality (term), we should describe the usage of that term. Then One-state reality can redirect to either One-state reality (term) or Israeli apartheid.VR (Please ping on reply) 22:26, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 20 May 2025
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add [failed verification] because the link redirects to irrelevant page and [citation needed]:
Diff:
| − | In 2011, a poll by Stanley Greenberg and the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion and sponsored by the [[Israel Project]] revealed that 61% of Palestinians reject a two state solution, while 34% said they accepted it | + | In 2011, a poll by Stanley Greenberg and the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion and sponsored by the [[Israel Project]] revealed that 61% of Palestinians reject a two state solution, while 34% said they accepted it.<sup class="noprint Inline-Template " style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i>[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|<span title="The material near this tag failed verification of its source citation(s).">failed verification</span>]]</i>]</sup> 66% said the Palestinians’ real goal should be to start with a two-state solution but then move to it all being one Palestinian state.<sup class="noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i>[[Wikipedia:Citation needed|<span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources.">citation needed</span>]]</i>]</sup> |
Throat0390 (talk) 20:12, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- URL fixed, not sure how the url for a different article got there but should be the right article now. That article does cover all the info mentioned in the paragraph Cannolis (talk) 20:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
References
- ^ Hoffman, Gil (2011-07-15). "6 in 10 Palestinians reject 2-state solution, survey finds". Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 2016-04-12.
- ^ Hoffman, Gil (2011-07-15). "6 in 10 Palestinians reject 2-state solution, survey finds". Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 2016-04-12.
Misleading citation
Wiki: "A Palestinian poll in September 2024 revealed that only 10% of respondents supported a single state that would provide equal rights for both Israelis and Palestinians."
Source: "A Palestinian poll in September put support for a state based on the borders of 1967 at 60%, compared with 10% who backed a single state with equal rights for Jews and Palestinians." ~2026-41921-23 (talk) 14:27, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- Maybe I’m being dense, but what is misleading about this? If you’re able to formulate your request as a proper edit request per WP:ARBPIA, we might be able to action it. Yr Enw (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
A Land for All
A Land for All is described here as a one-state proposal. However it was presented at a 2025 UN High-Level Conference as a promising way to implement the two-state solution.[1] Since it was presented at a UN conference, it does not fit here, since according to this article "the one-state solution has remained outside the range of official diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict."
In essence the proposal mirrors the structure of the European Union, with two sovereign states that agree to allow free travel and gradually allow residency rights to each other's citizens. Some issues that affect both states -- water, external security, human rights -- would be governed jointly by agreement.
I think that this description should be shifted to the Two-state solution. Pamela Miller (talk) 14:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- I think you are probably right. Hardal's view on the matter was clear in the Ezra Klein show last month - "we already have a one-state reality...under one regime and one power, which is the Israeli one. And the Palestinians live under daily domination and occupation and military control and apartheid...We are speaking about gradually opening the borders between Israel and Palestine as two states". Sean.hoyland (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.