Talk:Object lesson
Glad this article was not deleted, even though it languished without content for several years. The subject is not my area of specialization, but from some quic
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Suggestions for article flourishment
Glad this article was not deleted, even though it languished without content for several years. The subject is not my area of specialization, but from some quick searches it seems that there is significant material for an encyclopedic article (the 2 sources I cite alone provide interesting stories). It appears that much use of "object lesson" in relation to teaching is on sites that deal with Christian religious classes - this would merit some treatment in the article. Another consideration is how to handle other uses of the term that are not in the context of the classroom.--A12n (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguity
Should this article be renamed to object lesson (teaching)? Or should the "distinguish" template try to mention the other sense of the term, which doesn't involve a physical object in a classroom helping pupils learn about a topic, but rather a specific scenario that serves as an example of a principle or moral? http://www.thefreedictionary.com/object+lesson I don't think that merely having the Wiktionary template is enough to help reduce the realistic probability of confusion. Open4D (talk) 12:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- I believe 'lesson' implies teaching; while I recognize the two senses you posit, I believe they are related enough to be addressed by one article. As for Wiktionary, many of our 'sidenote' templates like infoboxes are recommended to accompany, not replace, explication in the main text; that can be the case here. Arlo James Barnes 04:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.