Talk:Nord Stream
Why is there no mention of the details published this week by Seymour Hersh which details the US sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline? Aliscat (talk) 18:15, 14
 | This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Nord Stream Sabotaged By The USA…
Why is there no mention of the details published this week by Seymour Hersh which details the US sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline? Aliscat (talk) 18:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Because of many reasons:
- 1. this is a summary page of sorts. His article is mentioned, briefly, in the related article 2022 Nord Stream pipeline sabotage.
- 2. we shouldn't go in depth on wikipedia into the details that Hersh wrote because much of what he wrote is on medium.com, therefore he had most likely no editorial oversight, therefore the article can be considered as self-published source. For extraordinary claims like this, there should be others collaborating the story However. there is no to little reliable sources backing or collaborating his or his anonymous source's story. – robertsky (talk) 19:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Cyborg occupation
Vyborg is an old Finnish town occupied currently by Soviet troops. Maybe wise to explain it a bit more clear. Anttir717 (talk) 15:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Certainly not here. The information is already there at Vyborg. — kashmīrī TALK 17:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Merge topics?
Shouldn't this text be merged with the information that is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nord_Stream_1 67.70.96.160 (talk) 18:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.