Talk:Nonconformity

Ethnocultural nonconformity is a disparaging term for ideological statelessness and ideological aracialsm (ideological nones in relation to any race) because it

Talk:Nonconformity

Create the page ethnocultural nonconformity

Ethnocultural nonconformity is a disparaging term for ideological statelessness and ideological aracialsm (ideological nones in relation to any race) because it pretends that conformity to some races and nationalities (or one) is the standard, but in democracy you are free to be an ideological stateless and an ideological aracialist.

Right-wingers claim that only ethnically South Africans can be nonracialists, but thus is contradictory (being an ethnic aracialism with restrictions to other thinkers) and it's not the case that only some South Africans are ideological aracialists. Gradience is important in these nonconformities. Maximal ideological aracialism and ideological statelessness means that you might have country documents and certainly a DNA characteristics, but your true race is none and your true state is none. Some people self-define affirmatively the common omnirace of humans (excluding unknown aliens? It not a joke. Accepting what you know might be a rejection of the unknown... or not.) and internationalism. Some race-country nonconformists give balanced definitions amongst global race-country acceptance and absolute rejection of these constructs. Others are pure negationists.

Ethnocultural ambivalence is about people having mixed feelings about race and ethnicity but that's a different topic. 2A02:587:4F06:B600:C8B0:A799:7A8A:39C2 (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ideological aracialism and ideological statelessness

These topics are taboos.

include the entries: ethnocultural nonconformity/ ideological statelessness/ ideological aracialism = not necessarily South-African nonracialism


Erudite nonconformists don't usually recognise conformity as default thus they use different terms and not self- disparaging ones.


Canada and the US record races but not ethnocultural nonconformity/ ideological statelessness/ ideological aracialism.

This is wrong because:

  • The usage of race/ethnicity/genetics for social compartmentalization is an idea.

Opposing ideas do exist.

  • Race is self-reported, not based on statistical genetics.
  • Ideological aracialists, ideological stateless and ethnocultural nonconformists do exist and the should be treated equally and recorded when other views are recorded.
  • The survey term "other" doesn't suffice for the rejection of the basic survey idea.

The fundamental rejection of ideas should be clearly stated. 2A02:587:4F06:B600:C8B0:A799:7A8A:39C2 (talk) 20:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.