The title of the article leads one to believe that it addresses the general concept of a network performance monitoring solution, but it is written as if it's t
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft
Generic discussion or product-specific?
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
The title of the article leads one to believe that it addresses the general concept of a network performance monitoring solution, but it is written as if it's the specific implementation of a network performance monitoring solution. Yet, the associated company is never really mentioned. The article should be written in a fashion similar to service assurance or operations support system which describe general capabilities and use cases. ktrueman (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, and at the moment the article makes only a weak assertion of notability per WP:PRODUCT. It's a minor component of Microsoft OMS, which itself isn't particularly notable, and Microsoft has just begun merging OMS into the Microsoft Azure portal.
There's really nothing here worth merging to an article on network performance monitoring, or to Network monitoring. The product's probably worth a mention at the Azure article, though the current title isn't suitable for redirecting there. Might I suggest moving it back to draft? It's not ready for main space in its current state. Donutron (talk) 20:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
This might not even exist anymore, I checked the Microsoft Azure website and all I saw were sections from other articles about similar functionality. 22jcampb (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.