Talk:Neon

Talk:Neon
Former good articleNeon was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 5, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 31, 2007Good article reassessmentKept
August 6, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
January 25, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
February 3, 2023Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Delisted good article

Cr(CO)5Ne

Cr(CO)5Ne is not counted as a true neon compound here, but the related W(CO)5Ar is counted as a true compound at the article argon. They must be both counted, or both not counted, but I'm not sure which is the right way. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think it should be considered a true compound indeed. Double sharp (talk) 11:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
same |possible (talk page stalker) Willbill6272 (talk) 15:45, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Infobox's Neon Spectral Lines seem clearly incorrect

Spectral Lines image seem incorrect (wrong element I'm assuming) Logically presented lines should add up to Red-Orange-Yellow light visible at the top of that very infobox, so should be predominantly of either of those colors (like the one included in the page text itself) Repnihrefs (talk) 20:26, 7 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Possibly swapped with Xenon, as it infobox emission lines seem mostly in yellow-red Repnihrefs (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.