This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (centre, colour, realise, program, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Neighbours is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kylie Minogue, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kylie Minogue on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kylie MinogueWikipedia:WikiProject Kylie MinogueTemplate:WikiProject Kylie MinogueKylie Minogue
This page has archives. Topics inactive for 180 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 2.
Article review
Latest comment: 11 months ago10 comments3 people in discussion
It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and noticed the following:
The article is too detailed, making it excessively long. The "History" sometimes contains a paragraph for every season (especially recent ones) when only the most important, overarching information should be included.
The "Setting" section is also too large and too detailed
The "Broadcast" section is too large and contains many short, one sentence paragraphs that should be merged together.
The "International versions and cooperations" has an uncited paragraph
I think we (those who worked on the article) should have a go at fixing the issues first, especially as it's mostly copy-editing and condensing. I'd understand taking it straight to GAR if it had major issues, like paragraphs of unsourced content. - JuneGloom07Talk01:29, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
@JuneGloom07 and 5 albert square: I ask about GAR see if anyone is interested in fixing up the article, or if it should go to a review. If editors are addressing the concerns, I won't send an article to GAR. When the above are resolved, I am happy to re-review. If you have any questions, feel free to ping me. Z1720 (talk) 03:08, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ah okay. I think there will be editors willing to work on any concerns. I've already sorted the issue in the "International versions and cooperations" section. - JuneGloom07Talk21:01, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
@JuneGloom07 and 5 albert square: Following up with this: and pinging you because you participated in the conversation above: great work has been published on the article, and I think there are still places for improvements, so I did another review and this is what I noticed:
The "Cancellation and revival" section seems quite long and could probably be trimmed,
"Popularity and viewership" is quite large and can probably be trimmed.
There are also lots of other places where information can be summarised more effectively or trimmed, with individual sentences merged or cut.
"Titles" is far too much detail for this article and can be trimmed massively or cut: most TV shows do not devote much prose to the show's title card as it is too much detail.
In the opposite direction, the "Cultural impact" section seems quite short, especially for such a long running show,
The article doesn't have a "Reception" or "Critical commentary" section where critic reviews of the show are described: I don't know if this is in the article prose already, but I would expect this to have its own section in any article about a TV show.
The Cultural impact section is a recent addition, but I can try to expand it. I think most of the Titles section is actually about the opening credits, not the title card. Neighbours updates its credits fairly frequently due to cast changes, so it gets reported on. The article has never had a reception section, but if it is to have one, then I think waiting until the final episode airs would be best. - JuneGloom07Talk17:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Z1720: Sorry, yes I am. I've been working on a few other things, but I did do some trimming of the Titles section. I'll make a start on the viewership and cancellation sections today. - JuneGloom07Talk
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.