Talk:Neeraj Chopra

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be bloc

Talk:Neeraj Chopra

Rank and decoration

(1) A decoration of a serviceman can be used as a honorific suffix, since it is related to his service shouldn't his rank be given too, in this case shouldn't the lead start, Subedar Neeraj Chopra VSM (2) Secondly Subedar is his rank not his honorific, contrary to what is written in the info box. Yogesh Khandke (talk)

Mass reversions of copy-editing

Hey all, a few weeks ago I copy edited the entire article and removed duplicate content from the lead. This was done in about ~20 diffs. These were mass-reverted by an IP user citing "Unnecessary mass removal by a user". However, only one of my ~20 diffs (this one) involved significant deletion of non-duplicated content. I have since restored my edits twice but they keep getting reverted again, by what I think may be the same user hopping across IP ranges. I have tried to collaborate with this user in multiple edit summaries [1], [2] and well as on one of their talk pages [3] but they haven't responded.

Can someone weigh in here on this? If anyone wants to add content back or undo any of my copy edits that is of course fine! But this mass-reversion of 20 diffs, including some improvements like this removal of obviously duplicated content in the lead feels disruptive. NicheSports (talk) 17:16, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

@NicheSports: You can take it to WP:ANI. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:26, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ugh, I was hoping to avoid that because I think this is a user that has been disruptively using many IP addresses, some of which, including the one that first reverted my updates, have recently been blocked. Which will make the ANI filing difficult for me as a newer editor. But ok, I can take it to ANI. If you think the user's most recent reversion was inappropriate could you revert it? That will help the ANI filing to show that I pursued other options and am not in one-on-one dispute with this IP editor. NicheSports (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Update. Per this thread many blocks have now been applied. Hopefully this resolves this issue. I'm going to restore the mass reverted updates now NicheSports (talk) 12:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
@NicheSports: Nice. Now that we have a case, we may undo future mass reverts by the IP-range and hopefully, able to persuade them into a discussion. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:02, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
The IP editor is back making the same reversion from a different IPv4 range. I've notified the previous blocking admin - do you think we should request semi protection on this page? This is a prolific IP editor who is blocked across many ranges already, I think they are just going to keep coming back NicheSports (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I totally forgot about them IPs, especially after this range block. Apparently, this new one is a proxy, meta or change in geo-location/vendor. Thanks for the revert BTW. Yes, I believe we may seek page protection. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:26, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I just requested semi-protection if you want to comment there NicheSports (talk) 18:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Its honorary rank

It is honorary rank and his actual rank is sub major..if writing honarary rank it is written as lt col(hony) neraj chopra..also the rank is in territorial army not army as such like mohanlal actor, ns dhoni and abhinav bhindra all in territorial army2409:40F3:20D9:F830:3105:12C9:DF35:2CA1 (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi there - I don't understand the request. Can you please suggest what exact change you'd like to make to the article? NicheSports (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.