Talk:NSLU2

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linux Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article says manufacturor is linksys, picture shows cisco logo!! --Mayz 07:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, Cisco has been quasi-schizophrenic in labeling Linksys equipment since it acquired Linksys. Suggestion? I could submit a photograph of my Linksys-branded NSLU2. pbryan 08:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I added a photo with visible Linksys logo 89.54.32.188 01:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

But lots about the modifications made. Should there be more about the hardware/a description of the device.

I think the modifications section in general is too unclear as to whether these are official modifications (eg, as model numbers increased or different options for the product) or if they are unofficial hacks. I'm assuming the latter though. 65.75.73.66 (talk) 06:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is nothing more than a Cisco advert. Proxy User (talk) 19:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

How so? —Reedy 20:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not too bad to me. I've made a couple of changes in the initial paras to try to describe what Cisco intend it to be a bit better. MarkMLl (talk) 23:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've chopped the text that described it as discontinued, it's certainly available as of July '08 and the cited Cisco web page treats it as a current device. MarkMLl (talk) 23:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm confused. The text describing it as discontinued is still there. Also it's no longer listed on the US pages of Linksys/Cisco, but it is on the UK pages. If it has some life left I could use it as the basis for a commercial project.Quilkin (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've added a recent device that might be an interesting replacement: Home Base F5L049 (with GPL firmware). I don't know the exact hardware info (amount of RAM/flash/CPU speed) but it is very similar to the NSLU2, but has 4 USB port and WIFI support. (I've looked at the linker script, it appears to have 64MB of SDRAM and 16MB of Flash, doubling the NSLU2 stats) --Rimidalw (talk) 11:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

At stock, the device runs a customised version of Linux

This article contains a great amount of information on hardware, however very little is stated about the firmware. Which Linux does it run a customised version of? And what does Linux refer to here anyway? Is it Linux 2.6, ucLinux or maybe a Linux distribution of some sort? Has it got code copied from a Linux 2.6 kernel? Or is it actually running a Linux 2.6 with minor patches? What GPL components has it got specifically? I'm asking this because of the licensing statement. bkil (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I dont think its based on a specific distribution, but Linksys use a customised version of the actual base kernel. Its actually 2.4 based.. Why not take a look at the sources available for download? —Reedy 19:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the input. See how little is stated in the article of the software side? :) So now I know that the original firmware was a modified Linux 2.4 kernel based distribution. What other GNU components did it contain? Anyhow, it was very generous of Linksys to develop and release a GPL licensed firmware and I fully support their philosophy. (I'm a happy Debian user myself!) However, I'm still not positive about the wording used in this article. To my understanding, if you sell a machine that runs a Linux kernel, you still have the choice to preinstall any proprietary software you wish on top of that. I'm asking here because you seem to be more competent on this topic than my humble self. bkil (talk) 18:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sure, thats how it works. Don't quote me on the actual GPL stuff, but because it is based on the linux kernel, they do have to release the GPL code. Proprietary software ontop, im not so sure about. I do know, that the network adapter and such are under a different license (Intels own)... And also, if i remember correctly, parts of the original source code are actuall obfuscated for one reason or another. —Reedy 20:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

There still seems to be some about... But the price is going up. I dunno, im pretty sure it is —Reedy 22:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NSLU2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110817162822/http://homesupport.cisco.com/en-us/wireless/lbc/NSLU2 to http://homesupport.cisco.com/en-us/wireless/lbc/NSLU2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Info on Page should be updated accordingly. 2001:9E8:695C:500:34B7:95F2:991F:2E74 (talk) 14:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply