Talk:NOTAR

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Rotorcraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

The previous version of this article stated that NOTAR rotorcraft use airflow directed from the engine exhaust to combat torque reaction. If NOTAR systems used engines to produce the airflow, they would lose all yaw control in the event of engine failure. NOTAR rotorcraft use a fan driven by the main rotor transmission to produce the required airflow - my changes reflect this.

M1thag0 12:42, 2 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

There is a dispute in the text of the article that needs resolution: The "Disadvantages" section claims a problem with control at high airspeeds, while the paragraph ending the "Use" section says that is inaccurate. Resolving this sort of thing is what the talk page is for, guys! --72.70.13.114 (talk) 00:51, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Should there not be a disadvantages section? The technology isn't completely Infallible. Issues such as efficiency and control at high airspeed have been mentioned on some websites. FitzyJ (talk) 08:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:NOTAR/CommentsTalk:NOTAR/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 22:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NOTAR. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.kulikovair.com/Notar.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312013423/http://www.mdhelicopters.com/products.php?id=NOTAR to http://www.mdhelicopters.com/products.php?id=NOTAR

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply