Talk:NBCUniversal

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NBCUniversal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments United States High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. France High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Media Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Amusement Parks Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

2014 2015 2016 2018 2019 2020 2022

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Universal Studios, Inc. § Requested move 31 August 2024. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

To quote the memo from Brian Roberts, CEO of parent company Comcast: Today we announced the exciting news that we intend to launch a new publicly traded company comprised of a strong portfolio of our cable television networks, including USA Network, CNBC, MSNBC, Oxygen, E!, SYFY, and Golf Channel, along with complementary digital assets including Fandango and Rotten Tomatoes, GolfNow and Sports Engine.^[1] 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 13:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Long press statement here. Appears that the tentative company will be SpinCo; interesting choice of name. 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 13:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Only a tentative name for now, spin-offs in the business industry are named SpinCo in corporate press to start out with. Nate • (chatter) 16:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Right... but should we get a new company article going? 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 16:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not right now...wait for much more to come, right now this is a section without true specifics (if we start an article on this now, the 'Universal Kids being sold to Scripps to become Qusproutbo' made-up crap IPs will give us headaches). Nate • (chatter) 17:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Any word on what becomes of NBCUniversal International Networks? There are some channels branded Syfy within the unit... BiggieSMLZ (talk) 22:08, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notified the talk pages of all that needed it. 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 13:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notified members of WikiProjects Companies, Media and Television. 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 13:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks to ActuallyNeverHappened02 for rolling back an edit today pointing to a different Versant. Now that the split is getting closer, it may be time to move the Versant details to a dedicated page. Would a senior editor consider spinning that up? (Per below, I have a self-declared COI related to Comcast NBCUniversal.) WeekdayUpdate (talk) 20:20, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks to @ViperSnake151 for creating an independent page for Versant (media company) — now it's there, would an editor consider tightening up the "Restructuring and Versant spinoff" section? It might make sense to trim that middle paragraph down to just the current opening sentence, "On November 20, 2024, Comcast announced that it would spin off most of its cable networks and selected digital properties into a new publicly traded company led by Mark Lazarus." — then link to the new page where all of the previous details are included. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 22:58, 13 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Would an editor consider removing this sentence from the top section:

"Since November 7, 2018, Sky Group, which holds European-only media and telecommunications interests, is also under Comcast's control alongside Comcast Business."

Sky Group and Comcast Business are different businesses within Comcast Corporation, and not necessarily relevant to the history of NBCUniversal. Thanks for your consideration. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 20:49, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. GoldRomean (talk) 03:48, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done WeekdayUpdate (talk) 18:31, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Would an editor consider making an update to the Divisons section? The current divisions are:

• Universal Destinations and Experiences
• NBCUniversal Media Group
• NBCUniversal News Group
• Universal Studios, Inc.

Universal Studio Group should be removed, as it is a unit within NBCUniversal Media Group, as validated by the NBCUniversal press website and by independent media coverage.^[1][2] Thanks for your consideration. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 21:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done Dahawk04 (talk) 22:13, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Would an editor consider streamlining this section by removing this segment?

"NBC Studios series brought into the company include the NBC dramas Las Vegas (with DreamWorks Television), Crossing Jordan, and American Dreams. Universal Network Television brought the Law & Order franchise and The District—in fact, Universal Network Television had co-produced American Dreams with NBC before the merger. Universal Television Distribution shows also brought into company include Jerry Springer and Maury."

(Most of these shows have not been in production for many years.) Thanks for your consideration. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 21:26, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done CornerLitTweak (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Would an editor consider shortening the Xumo paragraph under the "Preparation of Peacock streaming service" section? The first and last sentence are relevant to the NBCUniversal story, but everything else might be better told by linking to the Xumo page, where that information is duplicated. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 23:19, 13 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'll let someone else respond to this, just want to point out that this very much looks more like an attempt to curate a page ("the NBCUniversal story") as opposed to making encyclopedic contributions Likeanechointheforest (talk) 18:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Not done: As stated by the other User, it is not needed, it makes it unencyclopedic. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 01:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Would an editor consider removing the paragraph under the "Preparation of Peacock streaming service" section beginning with "NBCUniversal Content Studios was formed in October 2019..." The organizational references are no longer relevant to the broader story. Thanks for your consideration. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 23:32, 13 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Posting again what I posted above: "I'll let someone else respond to this, just want to point out that this very much looks more like an attempt to curate a page ("to the broader story") as opposed to making encyclopedic contributions Likeanechointheforest (talk) 18:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Not done: Read above. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 01:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

COI Disclosure: I have a conflict of interest with this article as I work with NBCUniversal. Per Wikipedia guidelines, I am not editing directly but proposing changes here for community review.

---

Summary:

I've noticed the History section contains several topics that are scattered across multiple subsections but could be consolidated for better reader navigation, consistent with WP:LAYOUT guidance. This proposal involves reorganizing existing sourced content—not removing information or adding new material.

---

Observation 1: Sports broadcasting content is fragmented

The article currently mentions sports broadcasting deals in passing within the History narrative, but readers looking for information about NBCUniversal's sports broadcasting would need to search through multiple sections. Comparable articles like The Walt Disney Company and Warner Bros. Discovery use dedicated sections to consolidate this type of content.

Content that is currently scattered includes:

• Olympics broadcasting (mentioned briefly but not consolidated)
• League partnerships

Per WP:STRUCTURE, would editors support consolidating existing sports broadcasting references into a dedicated subsection? This would be a reorganization of existing content for navigation purposes.

Observation 2: Content about creative partnerships could be better organized

For example, the article currently discusses the Amblin Partners relationship in the History section (circa 2015-2017). This is a significant ongoing business relationship that spans film production and distribution. There are similar examples from artists like Tina Fey, Jordan Peele, Jason Blum, Christopher Nolan, and Dick Wolf that readers might find useful under a single subhead.

Would there be interest in whether this type of long-term partnership content would benefit from its own subsection, or should it remain in the chronological History narrative? I'm genuinely asking for community guidance here, as I recognize there are valid arguments for both approaches.

---

Note: I'm asking for community input on whether these structural changes would improve the article's navigation, not requesting specific wording. Happy to defer to whatever approach editors prefer. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

A response has not yet been received for this question.

  Request closed for inactivity  

• The above edit request has not received any responses over the past 3 weeks (22 days in total).
• Discussion is often a key component to implementing edits, and requests may be adversely affected when they fail to garner input from either reviewing or requesting editors. In light of this — and as a safeguard — this request has been declined as needing discussion.
• The COI editor is urged to revive stalled communications by making contact with local editors on those editor's own talk pages, and then by moving those discussions back to this talk page.
• The COI editor may also wish to broadcast requests for edits at the talk pages of the WikiProjects which govern this article. Those projects are usually listed at the top of an article's talk page.

Regards,  Spintendo  09:14, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

COI Disclosure: I work with NBCUniversal and am not editing directly.

The introduction currently states that NBCUniversal has "ownership stakes in Snap Inc. and Vox Media." My understanding is that NBCUniversal has divested these positions.

Would an editor consider updating or removing this reference? I can provide sourcing for when these stakes were sold if that would be helpful. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 18:31, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I found a citation showing that NBCUniversal sold its stake in Snap Inc., but could not find a similar citation about Vox Media. CornerLitTweak (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for finding the Snap citation. Regarding the Vox Media stake — there's been a development since this was originally posted. When Comcast completed its separation of Versant Media Group in January 2026, the Vox Media ownership stake transferred to Versant along with other digital assets (Fandango, Rotten Tomatoes, etc.). Multiple trade sources have since confirmed this:

• "Comcast Completes Versant Spinoff, Cable Networks Company Stock Drops" — Variety, January 2026 (details assets transferred to Versant)
• "Versant Interested in Vox Media's Podcast Business" — TheWrap, March 2026 (confirms Versant inherited the Vox Media stake from the Comcast/NBCU spinoff)
• "Comcast Completes Versant Media Separation of Cable Networks" — The Hollywood Reporter, January 2026

Since NBCUniversal no longer holds this stake, the reference to Vox Media in the introduction appears to be outdated. Combined with the Snap divestiture you already confirmed, would an editor consider removing or updating these ownership references in the lead section? WeekdayUpdate (talk)

WeekdayUpdate (talk) 03:47, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Done

CornerLitTweak (talk) 21:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

COI Disclosure: I work with NBCUniversal and am not editing directly.

The article currently states NBCUniversal is "the third-largest operator of amusement parks in the world" citing 2017 TEA/AECOM data (reference 6). Current industry reports indicate NBCUniversal is now the second-largest operator.

Would an editor consider updating this with current sourcing? I can provide citations from recent TEA/AECOM reports or financial news coverage if helpful. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Do you have that citation? I can't find a report that matches this claim. CornerLitTweak (talk) 05:30, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not done for now: pending source/per above. GoldRomean (talk) 20:23, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

COI Disclosure: I work with NBCUniversal and am not editing directly.

The "Possible acquisition of Paramount Skydance" subsection currently contains two items, both describing events that have not occurred. The sources cited attribute the claims to unnamed industry analysts and use speculative language ("may try to merge," "may merge to bolster"). No acquisition has been announced, no regulatory filing exists, and no official negotiations have been confirmed by either party.

Per WP:CRYSTAL, Wikipedia generally avoids presenting speculation about future events as encyclopedic content. I'd also note that comparable articles (The Walt Disney Company, Warner Bros. Discovery) do not include standalone subsections for rumored acquisitions that remain unconfirmed.

Would an editor consider whether this subsection meets the threshold for inclusion under WP:CRYSTAL? If there's consensus that the coverage is notable enough to retain, a single sentence within the broader restructuring context might be more proportionate than a dedicated subsection. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2026 (UTC) :Reply

A response has not yet been received for this question.

  Request closed for inactivity  

• The above edit request has not received any responses over the past 3 weeks (22 days in total).
• Discussion is often a key component to implementing edits, and requests may be adversely affected when they fail to garner input from either reviewing or requesting editors. In light of this — and as a safeguard — this request has been declined as needing discussion.
• The COI editor is urged to revive stalled communications by making contact with local editors on those editor's own talk pages, and then by moving those discussions back to this talk page.
• The COI editor may also wish to broadcast requests for edits at the talk pages of the WikiProjects which govern this article. Those projects are usually listed at the top of an article's talk page.

Regards,  Spintendo  09:14, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Conflict of interest disclosure: I work with NBCUniversal and am submitting this as an edit request per WP:COI rather than editing the article directly.

A recent edit changed Donna Langley's title in the Notable people section from "Chairman, NBCUniversal Entertainment" to "Chairman, NBCUniversal Entertainment & Studios." The revised title does not appear to be supported by current reliable sources.

Coverage of Langley's BAFTA Fellowship in February 2026 refers to her as Chairman, NBCUniversal Entertainment:

• The Hollywood Reporter, "'Decency Is a Superpower': Donna Langley Receives BAFTA Fellowship, Touting Cinema's Power to Help Us 'See Each Other More Clearly'" (February 2026). https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/bafta-awards-donna-langley-fellowship-decency-superpower-1236510489/
• Deadline, "Donna Langley To Receive BAFTA Fellowship At 2026 Film Awards" (February 2026). https://deadline.com/2026/02/donna-langley-fellowship-bafta-film-awards-1236729159/

Per WP:V, the title used in the Notable people list should match what reliable independent sources currently report. Requesting the entry be restored to Chairman, NBCUniversal Entertainment, with one or both of the above sources cited inline.

— WeekdayUpdate (talk) 03:31, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

A response has not yet been received for this question.

  Request closed for inactivity  

• The above edit request has not received any responses over the past 3 weeks (22 days in total).
• Discussion is often a key component to implementing edits, and requests may be adversely affected when they fail to garner input from either reviewing or requesting editors. In light of this — and as a safeguard — this request has been declined as needing discussion.
• The COI editor is urged to revive stalled communications by making contact with local editors on those editor's own talk pages, and then by moving those discussions back to this talk page.
• The COI editor may also wish to broadcast requests for edits at the talk pages of the WikiProjects which govern this article. Those projects are usually listed at the top of an article's talk page.

Regards,  Spintendo  09:14, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

COI Disclosure: I work with NBCUniversal and will not edit the page directly.

A couple of observations about the Sports section, offered for editors to weigh — I'm not proposing specific wording, just flagging the gaps and providing sources for whoever decides to take this on.

First, the section currently opens with early newsreel and experimental-broadcast history and then lists individual rights deals, with no short overview to orient the reader on how NBCUniversal's sports operations are structured today. Editors may wish to consider whether a brief lead sentence would help, along the lines of how The Walt Disney Company and Fox Corporation summarize their sports arms before getting into specifics. I'll leave whether to add one, and how to phrase it, entirely to editors.

Second, several major properties NBCUniversal currently holds national U.S. rights to are not mentioned in the section. If editors think any of these belong, here are the facts with independent sourcing — the wording and level of detail would be theirs to decide:

• Major League Baseball — returns to NBC and Peacock for the 2026 season under a three-year agreement (2026–28), taking over Sunday-night and Wild Card Series coverage; reported as NBC's first regular MLB coverage in decades.

"MLB finalizes national TV broadcast deals with ESPN, NBC, Netflix" — CBS Sports

"MLB Finalizes Short-Term TV Rights Deals, Adds NBC and Netflix" — Front Office Sports

• NASCAR — under media rights agreements running 2025 through 2031, NBC carries the closing stretch of the NASCAR Cup Series season, including the playoffs and championship race.

"NASCAR announces new media rights deal for 2025 and beyond" — CBS Sports

• Big Ten football — beginning in 2023, NBC carries a Big Ten Conference football package ("Big Ten Saturday Night") on NBC and Peacock under a seven-year agreement running through 2029–30.

"Big Ten completes 7-year, $7 billion media rights agreement with Fox, CBS, NBC" — ESPN

"Big Ten reaches seven-year media rights deal with CBS, Fox and NBC through 2029-30" — CBS Sports

• Notre Dame football — NBC has carried Notre Dame home football games since 1991, with the partnership extended through the 2029 season.

"Notre Dame football extends TV deal with NBC through 2029" — ESPN

"Notre Dame Looks to Maintain Independence with NBC Extension" — Sportico

• Golf (USGA championships) — NBC is the broadcast home of the U.S. Open and other USGA championships, under an agreement that the USGA and NBCUniversal extended through 2032.

"USGA sticks with NBC for coverage of U.S. Open" — ESPN

"USGA strikes media rights deal with NBC and Versant through 2032" — Golf Digest

Whether to add any of this, how much to include, and how to word it is up to editors — I'm just supplying the sourced facts. Happy to provide additional independent sources for any item on request. Flagging WP:COI: I have a conflict of interest and will not edit the page directly.

WeekdayUpdate (talk) 14:33, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done CornerLitTweak (talk) 03:08, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Question for editors about where the article handles NBCUniversal's standing production relationships.

Content about Universal's long-running relationships with filmmakers and television producers is currently spread across the History section and the infobox. The Amblin Partners formation, the 2017 minority stake in Amblin, and the DreamWorks Animation acquisition sit chronologically within History, while the Amblin and Blumhouse stakes also appear in the Brands list of the infobox. A reader trying to understand how Universal works with outside creators has to assemble it from several places.

For consistency with comparable articles — Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Skydance both group recurring studio and producer relationships rather than scattering them through the chronology — would it make sense to add a dedicated subsection that consolidates this material? On the heading, I'd defer to editors; something neutral such as Production partnerships is probably more appropriate under WP:NPOV than anything more elaborate. Whether to create it, where to place it, and what to call it would be editors' calls — I'm raising it rather than prescribing it.

To show the kind of material that already exists and could sit together, here are several relationships, each with independent sourcing. I'm not proposing wording — just offering the sourced facts so editors can judge what, if anything, belongs and how to phrase it:

• Steven Spielberg / Amblin Partners — NBCUniversal holds a minority stake in Amblin Partners (acquired 2017), and Universal/Focus Features distributes Amblin's films under a partnership first announced in 2015. (Already cited in the article's History section.)

• Dick Wolf / Wolf Entertainment — overall deal with Universal Television spanning nearly 40 years; produces the Law & Order, One Chicago and FBI franchises. The deal was extended in 2023 through 2027.

"With Nine Shows on the Air, Dick Wolf Extends Overall Deal at Universal Television Through 2027" — Variety

"Dick Wolf Extends Universal TV Overall Deal" — The Hollywood Reporter

• Tina Fey / Little Stranger — overall deal with Universal Television and a first-look deal with Universal Pictures dating to 2016; recent and continuing work for NBCUniversal platforms including Peacock.

"Tina Fey's Little Stranger Inks First-Look Deal With Universal" — Variety

"Lang Fisher & Tina Fey Adapting 'Finlay Donovan Is Killing It' For Peacock" — Deadline

• Jordan Peele / Monkeypaw Productions — first-look deal with Universal Pictures signed in 2017 and extended in 2019, under which Universal released Get Out, Us and Nope.

"Jordan Peele Inks Rich Five-Year First-Look Deal With Universal" — The Hollywood Reporter

• Christopher Nolan / Syncopy — Universal released Nolan's Oppenheimer (2023) and is distributing his next film, The Odyssey (2026).

"Christopher Nolan's 'The Odyssey' News: Everything We Know So Far" — Deadline

The Odyssey (2026 film) — Wikipedia

Whether any of this is added, how much, and how it's worded would be entirely up to editors. If the structural change is agreeable, I'm happy to provide additional independent sources or a fuller list in a follow-up so each item can be evaluated on its own merits. Flagging WP:COI: I have a conflict of interest and will not edit the page directly.

WeekdayUpdate (talk) 14:52, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done CornerLitTweak (talk) 04:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I lifted the 2026 version of the Comcast NBCUniversal logo from their ad banner on The New York Times. If someone could convert that to SVG format and upload to Commons (and then add to this article), that would be great. Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:49, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The user below has a request that an edit be made to NBCUniversal. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 610 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

COI Disclosure: I work with NBCUniversal and will not edit the page directly, per WP:COI.

A small question for editors about the theme-park coverage on this page.

The article's treatment of Universal's theme-park operations is brief, and one independently-documented item isn't mentioned: the partnership between Nintendo and Universal (announced May 2015) that produced the Super Nintendo World areas now open at Universal Studios Japan, Universal Studios Hollywood and Universal Epic Universe. Comparable corporate articles tend to note major IP partnerships of this scale within the relevant segment.

For consistency, would it make sense to add a brief, neutral mention — a sentence or so — in the Universal Destinations & Experiences context, cross-linking to Super Nintendo World so the detail sits on those articles rather than here? I'd defer entirely to editors on whether to add it and how to phrase it. Independent sourcing for the partnership:

"Nintendo and Universal power up for theme park attractions" — CNN

I'm happy to provide independent sources for the individual park openings if useful. WP:COI: I have a conflict of interest and will not edit the page directly.

WeekdayUpdate (talk) 15:12, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

COI Disclosure: I work with NBCUniversal and will not edit the page directly, per WP:COI.

The user below has a request that an edit be made to NBCUniversal. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 610 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

A structural question for editors, following on the production-partnership reorganization that has held up well.

The article covers Universal's studios mostly through acquisition history — DreamWorks Animation and Illumination appear where they entered the company, and the ongoing film and television properties those studios produce aren't gathered anywhere. A reader who wants to know what the company actually makes has to reconstruct it from the chronology. Most of these franchises have their own articles already, so under WP:SS a short section here could summarize and link out rather than duplicate anything.

Would editors support a brief Franchises section? On the heading and placement I'd defer entirely — "Franchises" seems more neutral than anything longer, but that's editors' call.

To show what independent sourcing exists, here are the properties I'd expect such a section to touch, each with trade coverage:

• Jurassic Park — the seventh film, Jurassic World Rebirth, opened to $322.6 million worldwide in July 2025, the biggest worldwide opening of 2025 for a Hollywood release to that point; the three prior Jurassic World films each passed $1 billion.

"Box Office: 'Jurassic World Rebirth' Hatches New Era for Dino Franchise With $323M Global Bow" — The Hollywood Reporter

• Fast & Furious — crossed $7 billion in worldwide box office across 11 films with Fast X (2023).

"Fast & Furious Franchise Speeds Past $7 Billion At Global Box Office" — Deadline

• Despicable Me / Minions (Illumination) — the first animated franchise to reach $5 billion worldwide (2024); a third Minions film is dated for June 2027.

"'Despicable Me'/'Minions' Becomes First Animated Franchise To Reach $5B In Global Box Office" — Deadline

• Wicked — the two-part adaptation set a record for a Broadway musical adaptation; Wicked: For Good opened to $147 million domestically and $223 million worldwide in November 2025.

"Box Office: 'Wicked For Good' Opens to Record-Smashing $147M in U.S." — The Hollywood Reporter

• Law & Order (Wolf Entertainment / Universal Television) — SVU was renewed for a 28th season in the 2026–27 cycle, extending its record as the longest-running primetime drama in American television history; it passes 600 episodes next season.

"'Law & Order: SVU' Renewed for Season 28 at NBC" — The Hollywood Reporter

• Saturday Night Live — the SNL50 anniversary special drew 14.8 million viewers on NBC and Peacock in February 2025, NBC's largest primetime entertainment telecast in five years.

"TV Ratings: 'SNL50' Scores Nearly 15M Viewers for NBC and Peacock" — The Hollywood Reporter

I'm not proposing wording for any of this — the facts are here so editors can judge whether a section is warranted and what belongs in it.

WeekdayUpdate (talk) 19:31, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply