Talk:Mutant Zero

i heard a rumor that its psylocke sorry if this is bad —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.138.232 (talk) 03:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply It would b

Talk:Mutant Zero

Speculation

i heard a rumor that its psylocke sorry if this is bad  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.138.232 (talk) 03:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply 

It would be nice, but not very likely, since she's currently at the Exiles team. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.107.4.202 (talk) 15:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assuming none of the indications given so far are red herrings, there's a good possibility she might actually be Madelyne Pryor (well, unless someone went and decided to bring Jean Grey back... again). --The Fifth Horseman (talk) 19:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well known mutant, non-comics fans know her, cover-worthy, telekinesis: not Pryor, but Jean :o October 08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.90.112.189 (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Maybe Scarlet Witch? Most likely not just brainstorming. If that's against the rules then im sorry  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.133.179 (talk) 21:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)Reply 

Ultimate Mutant Zero

Should it be mentioned that Wolverine is considered "Mutant Zero" in the Ultimate Universe? Or is this too off-topic for this particular article? Flutterman (talk) 03:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

He has been referred to being "Mutant Zero", but only once. The meaning is possibly related to "patient zero". Since this article is a) not about Wolverine and b) not related to the Ultimate universe in any other fasion, this information does not belong in it. --The Fifth Horseman (talk) 19:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Typhoid Mary

Now that Mutant Zero's identity has been revealed to be Typhoid Mary, perhaps this page should be merged into Typhoid Mary's? I have updated the Typhoid Mary page to include her Mutant Zero identity, but since they're the same character, there shouldn't be two separate pages now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PhoenixRisingNYC (talkcontribs) 05:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.