Talk:Multiple

Multiple has been a redir to Multiplication for a couple month. It should have simply been turned into a disamb page, but instead was changed to the newly creat

Talk:Multiple

Requested move

Multiple has been a redir to Multiplication for a couple month. It should have simply been turned into a disamb page, but instead was changed to the newly created Multiple (disambiguation)--it's a complete waste of readers' time and Wikipedia resources to pass primary disambiguation thru a redir.

The only other thing I thot of is there might be an argument that Multiplication deserves the primary disambiguation for "multiple", in which the redir should be reverted and an appropriate dab header added to Multiplication to the new disamb page. However, IMHO that is only better for editors too lazy to check their link targets, and putting the disambig content at multiple better serves the readers, who I hope we all feel should be put first. 24.17.48.241 05:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Voting

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~

Discussion

multiples are green.Since multiple wasn't even mentioned on the multiplication page I created a page Multiple (mathematics) where it is defined and made the disambiguation page reference it. Since it is only a stub I don't think it should be the primary page for multiple. The disambiguation page seems fine to me.

TooMuchMath 22:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Result

Moved. WhiteNight T | @ | C 21:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.