Talk:Mount Washington

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mount Washington article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

	Mount Washington has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 1, 2016 Good article nominee Listed January 3, 2026 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article

This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: New Hampshire / New Hampshire Mountains Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire Mountains (assessed as Top-importance). Mountains Top‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Cycling Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This removed text, from the ext links,

, the only railway in the world built entirely on trestles, 3.1 miles (5.2 km).

is either incoherant or just wrong. The tracks are laid on the ground at the summit, at the crossing with the Gulfside Trail, and apparently all the way between those two points; also at the Base Station and presumably large stretches between there and Gulfside. --Jerzy(t) 19:36, 2005 Jan 18 (UTC)

Modified avalanche text

and which have killed more than 130 people since 1849, largely in Tuckerman.

This number is more than all of the recorded deaths from all causes in all of the Presidentials, including falls, heart attacks, plane crashes, and railroad accidents. There were 2 Tucks avalanche deaths in 1954, 1 in 1956, and 2 in 2002, for a total of 5 , unless you add the one in 1996 on Lion's Head (which of course is 5 too many). Ref Howe, Nicholas(2000). Not Without Peril pp.299-304. and 11/29/2002 news at timefortuckerman.com. If we really need a fatality number, maybe it should cover all of Mt Washington, but maybe an external link to a compendium is sufficient. (updated talk) Lupinelawyer 01:45, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The infobox shows an error, regarding language: Native name Error: Error {{native name}}: an IETF language tag as parameter {{{1}}} is required (help): an IETF language tag as parameter {{{1}}} is required (help). The aboriginal language spoken was Western Abenaki, ISO 639-3 code: "abe". Anything that can be done to undo the error would be welcome!

HopsonRoad (talk) 18:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

It looks like a widespread issue. I haven't been able to fully parse what's going on, but there's a discussion here, which I found by looking up the template in the error: Template:Native_name. If you need more help, ask again. – Anon423 (talk) 19:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

(edit conflict)

According to d:Help:Wikimedia language codes/lists/all the Wikimedia software doesn't have an IETF code corresponding to the ISO tag 'abe', which explains why the error occurs. What should be done about it is another matter. Looking at the documentation and source code of {{Infobox mountain}} I see you can supply a separate parameter native_name_lang= which does accept the ISO tag - I tried it - so like this:

| native_name = Agiocochook
| native_name_lang = abe

Hope this helps. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pinging @HopsonRoad:. Normally, we expect to see the {{help me}} template used on your own talk page, where a ping would be superfluous. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

IETF language tags are assembled from a primary subtag (the ISO 639-1, -2, -3 language code) and optionally region, script, and variant subtags. |native_name_lang=, despite what the {{infobox mountain}} documentation says, is not constrained to accept only ISO 639-2 language codes. It is not clear to me why the documentation specifies ISO 639-2.

The goal of the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Infoboxes § native name parameters is to cleanup the mess that is |native_name= and |native_name_lang=. Questions about that should be asked there.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The key col ridgeline prominence goes all the way to the Champlain Canal on the New York border over 100 miles away. The real prominence is more like 5,200 ft from the circa 1,000 ft elevation valley on the west side. B137 (talk) 08:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs, especially in the second half of the article. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

It may seem obvious, but if this article is meant to stand as a general reference, a line somewhere indicating that the mountain is named after the first President of the United States would be a good idea. ~2026-10369-57 (talk) 22:22, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestion. There was mention already about who named it. I linked it more explicitly to George Washington. HopsonRoad (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply