Talk:Model–view–adapter
There doesn't seem to be anything known about this architecture beyond the original author's understanding. A quick Google search indicates that this pattern's
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Delete
There doesn't seem to be anything known about this architecture beyond the original author's understanding. A quick Google search indicates that this pattern's usage starts and ends with Bungee Connect. Candidate for deletion? --87.198.21.132 (talk) 11:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, delete it. Unless the original creator wants to expand on it, and provide some reference to an author who writes about it or uses it. There's too many variations of the MVC pattern to have some unknown one lying around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.171.52 (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Apparently you are unaware of Sun's very educational article on this topic. Sun's article now forms the basis of this article. —optikos (talk) 03:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- It would make sense to delete it. The basis of this architecture as described is that it entirely separates Model from View while claiming that MVC does not. And yet the first image at the top of Model–view–controller shows that in fact MVC (as commonly understood) does exactly this. So if it's not going to be deleted it needs a rewrite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.192.122 (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.