Talk:Minecraft speedrunning

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation–supported course assignment, between 25 August 2025 and 30 March 2026. Further details are availa

Talk:Minecraft speedrunning

Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation–supported course assignment, between 25 August 2025 and 30 March 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bag of rats (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Matthewjrhode (talk) 16:24, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

1.16 version split

Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

In the infobox, lowkey's WR is under the 1.16-1.19 category while in the body it says 1.16+. The run is in the speedrun.com category 1.16-1.19 but RSG runs in that category also includes 1.20+, the version split is only in effect for set seed runs. Should it be 1.16+ or 1.16-1.19. Depolar (talk) 03:17, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

i think it should stay as 1.16-1.19 as that is what speedrun.com knows it as, but colloquially in the mcsr community it is just known as 1.16.1, as it is impossible to get anywhere close to a top time in any other version in the category. every run in the top 1000 at least (on https://www.speedrun.com/mc) is on 1.16.1. i vote "1.16-1.19" as that is what it is on speedrun.com, as well as the fact that "1.16+" is never even used in conversation, just used to indicate when the game progressed in its updates. (e.g. netherite only exists in 1.16+) Willunderscoremp3 (talk) 07:42, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Willunderscoremp3 Okay listen listen while I totally agree with you on this, weee should have come to an agreement before making any changes. I'm not gonna revert it since she hasn't responded yet, but also something to keep in mind in the future lolol
love the energy though ..! pattersonuwu njz (talk) 08:05, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
my bad i was trigger happy 🦋 Willunderscoremp3 (talk) 16:50, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

world record addition - on verification, or put as 'pending'

Latest comment: 11 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

skycrab just broke the wr about an hour ago, should the new edit list the record as 'pending,' or should it just wait until its verified on speedrun.com? wr video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NemhyWVAY68 cloudseyy 🦋 19:48, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, never saw this. Seeing as one of the most fundamental (not really) guidelines of wikipedia is Each fact or claim in an article must be verifiable, and that run is literally unverified, lets wait until it's verified by the mods. Of course, if the run received media coverage from a reliable secondary source, it could be added for that, but I don't think any reliable source would be covering an unverified run. Also tagging @Dwarfroe cause they've been reverting changes like this pattersonuwu njz (talk) 10:23, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.