Talk:Medical physicist

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text or other creative content from this version of Medical physics was copied or moved into Medical physicist with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

I propose that the Education and training section of the Medical physics article be merged into Medical physicist. I think that this is a more appropriate and relevant location, while the Medical physics article could do with being more concise and accurately summing up the field, rather than the profession (this article). Beevil (talk) 18:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have now carried out this split Beevil (talk) 09:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medical physicist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130715110915/http://www.prospects.ac.uk/medical_physicist_entry_requirements.htm to http://www.prospects.ac.uk/medical_physicist_entry_requirements.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medical physicist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101128075112/http://theabr.org/ic/ic_rp/ic_rp_newcampep.html to http://www.theabr.org/ic/ic_rp/ic_rp_newcampep.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Presently "United Kingdom" is a subsection of "Europe". However, since Brexit (at the latest as of January 2021) UK law may diverge from EU law. I was going to move "Europe" to "European Union" and place "United Kingdom" at the same level, but the body EFOMP includes both the UK and other non-EU countries. So I guess the structure should be left as it is, but we have to keep an eye on new UK laws and regulations which move away from the EU framework.--2A02:8071:2195:9600:9C8A:F476:F3D3:F027 (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply