Talk:Matthew Smith

I question these page moves. Remeber Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that happens be on the Internet, not an Internet encyclopedia. It should thus not reflect th

Talk:Matthew Smith

Untitled

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I question these page moves. Remeber Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that happens be on the Internet, not an Internet encyclopedia. It should thus not reflect the current biases of the Internet. - SimonP 22:05, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)

I think that "Matthew Smith" or "Matt Smith" (with redirects, including from Mathew Smith) should be a disambiguation page. I don't think that any of the Matt Smiths are "clearly predominant" in the same way that Rome might mean a village in Ohio. --Mrwojo 00:00, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If anyone is predominant, it's Matthew Smith the painter. There are entire books devoted to his works, and not just from vanity publishers. Here is a biography published by Faber in '97; here is another published by Lund Humphries in '95. The computer programmer seems a pipsqueak in comparison; indeed, borderline VfD fodder. Thus I suggest conversion of Matthew Smith into a disambiguation page. I'd "be bold" and do this myself, but it requires a deletion and I don't have the requisite superpowers. -- Hoary 09:17, 2005 Apr 23 (UTC)

even as a fan of this Matthew Smith I think it should be a disambiguation page - even the MobyGames page linked to confuses two different people involved in games called Matthew Smith.--Scatterkeir 03:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.