Mathematical analysis was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
This page has archives. Topics inactive for 365 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.
Basic analysis
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Can the article have an alternate heading of Basic Analysis in the Real Analysis Section or some reference to the term Basic Analysis? I searched wikipedia for Basic Analysis and could not find the term. I found this article using Google searches.
I think the term Basic Analysis is still in common use and would help searchers and readers if the term Basic Analysis was cross-referenced with the term Real Analysis for example: http://www.jirka.org/ra/realanal.pdfJcardazzi (talk) 04:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)jcardazziReply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You need to be more clear on whether or not Cauchy produced a "modern" mathematical system of analysis, with strict definitions/axioms unlike Newton who differentiated on intuition. VictorPorton (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Proposed link update for vector analysis
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The current "Vector analysis" section links to book articles.
It would be more useful to link to Vector calculus which provides a broader overview of the field. What do you think? mw (talk) 12:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
By the way, I have removed the text-book style explanation of what is a vector, and the basic examples that do not belong to this section. D.Lazard (talk) 16:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Famous textbooks
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Famous is not a WP criterion, WP:Notability is. The following have been removed:
Foundation of Analysis: The Arithmetic of Whole Rational, Irrational and Complex Numbers, by Edmund Landau
^Mathematical Analysis: A Modern Approach to Advanced Calculus, 2nd Edition. ASIN0201002884.
^Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces. ASIN0691113866.
^Ahlfors, Lars (January 1, 1979). Complex Analysis: An Introduction to the Theory of Analytic Functions of One Complex Variable. McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN978-0070006577.
^Amann, Herbert; Escher, Joachim (2004). Analysis I. Birkhäuser. ISBN978-3764371531.
^Amann, Herbert; Escher, Joachim (16 May 2008). Analysis II. Birkhäuser Basel. ISBN978-3764374723.
^Amann, Herbert; Escher, Joachim (2009). Analysis III. Springer. ISBN978-3764374792.
^Bogachev, Vladimir I.; Smolyanov, Oleg G. (2021). Real and Functional Analysis. Springer. ISBN978-3030382216.
^Lang, Serge (2012). Real and Functional Analysis. Springer. ISBN978-1461269380.
An article can be written about any notable textbook in this list. Then it is eligible for inclusion in section Notable textbooks. Rgdboer (talk) 21:41, 24 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.