Could someone explain why this is considered as an advetrisement, while products as those mentioned below are not? 62.209.163.217 (talk) 10:55, 8 February 2008
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Could someone explain why this is considered as an advetrisement, while products as those mentioned below are not? 62.209.163.217 (talk) 10:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I believe I just added basic infromation about the software, similar to what you can find for e.g. Simulink, Matlab, and Mathematica, so I must admit I cannot really understand why it is contested. As an example the page includes links to the most important competitors which e.g. the Simulink page does not.
There is no explanation given to the advert tag, and as the page follows the style of other software pages (see examples above) I'll remove the Advert tag. Brugard (talk) 19:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC).
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.