Talk:Master Mariner

Okay--in use from the 13th Century or introduced during the 19th Century? I moved this as part of a cleanup; not my area of expertise. Quill 22:02, 21 Dec 200

Okay--in use from the 13th Century or introduced during the 19th Century? I moved this as part of a cleanup; not my area of expertise. Quill 22:02, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

When these paragraphs were part of the Master article I questioned the implication that midshipman was the route to higher rank for the sons of privileged families while master's mate was the route for less privileged men. I argued that this is the impression one would get through some nautical fiction. But I question whether that is an authoritative enough source to be included on the main page of a wikipedia article.

My recent contribution to the Master Mariner article was a paragraph where I talked about the Master's role as a standing officer. I suspect that the rate of master's mate was one that could be awarded or withdrawn at the discretion of a ship's captain. I don't know that from an authoritative enough source for inclusion.

Master's mate was a more senior rate than midshipman. And it is my understanding that even a son of privilege was likely to pass through that rank while on his way to Lieutenant. Geo Swan 16:39, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Merge suggsted

I feel pretty confident that merging this page with Captain (nautical) makes sense. Any thoughts? Haus42 01:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge completed

I completed the merge as per Talk:Captain (nautical) without getting rid of much material at all. Haus42 22:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.