Talk:Mark Changizi

Changizi has a Twitter account and Youtube account dedicated to promoting anti-vax and anti-lockdown theories. This seems to be his current profession. He has a

Talk:Mark Changizi

Doesn’t address Changizi’s COVID work

Changizi has a Twitter account and Youtube account dedicated to promoting anti-vax and anti-lockdown theories. This seems to be his current profession. He has about 55,000 followers on Twitter, so he has a fairly large audience. Narwhalfalafel (talk) 09:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Have had a search, but not a lot of reliable sources about. Best I can find is "Mark Changizi, Daniel Kotzin, and Michael Senger were frequent Twitter users who often wrote with skepticism or criticism of the government’s approach to COVID-19, such as questioning the effectiveness of masks or vaccines ... " and the resulting legal cases.[1] Have not put this in the article as I am unsure whether Cato.org is an RS. My guess is not, due to its inherent bias. Tacyarg (talk) 11:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Would Courthouse News Service be a RS? https://www.courthousenews.com/twitter-users-suspended-for-covid-tweets-argue-to-reinstate-case-against-feds/ ~2026-26419-64 (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Bembridge, Nicole Saad; Berry, Thomas A (5 December 2022). "Changizi v. Department of Health and Human Services". Cato.org. Retrieved 10 July 2023.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.