Someone moved it from MU* games to MUD clients. I don't feel this is appropriate since it is a protocol the servers must also implement to be of use. --Sydius
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Someone moved it from MU* games to MUD clients. I don't feel this is appropriate since it is a protocol the servers must also implement to be of use. --Sydius (talk) 20:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
MXP is discussed in several mud client related articles while mention of it is absent in mud games related articles. Also, MXP originated from Zmud.
Certainly MUD servers require implementing MXP, but extending that reasoning, do you also propose that JavaScript should be categorized in the 'notable websites' category? --Scandum (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, I'm saying that putting it in MUD clients is too specific. If there were a MUD protocols category, I'd say it should go in that, but there isn't (maybe there should be, since I can think of at least three, but maybe that's not enough). It applies to both clients and servers, and MU* Games is the most-specific category I could find that isn't so specific that it rules out half the context in which the protocol is used. --Sydius (talk) 01:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Objection to deletion proposal
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As per my similar edit to MCCP I oppose the deletion of this page. I recognise that the quality is not particularly high (and in this case it matches that of the protocol which has some areas that have not been "nailed down" firmly and are subject to {possibly incompatible} "variation" in implementation!) SlySven (talk) 11:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.