Talk:Lychgate

I have merged lych gate into lychgate (as was requested). My choice in the direction of the merge (i.e. to lychgate) was based on a Google test; if there a gene

Talk:Lychgate

Merge

I have merged lych gate into lychgate (as was requested). My choice in the direction of the merge (i.e. to lychgate) was based on a Google test; if there a general consensus against this, simply switch the text to the other page (i.e. lych gate) and replace the words as needed. 24.126.199.129 19:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I find it interesting that North American indigenous people has a belief that if the Owl called their name they would die. I see in this article the a LYCH owl had the same reputation, the word Lych, corpse, having survioved from old saxon. ````peterdodge —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.231.95 (talk) 16:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

St. George's Church in Beckenham, England (now a part of london)

It would be great if someone in the London area or visiting it could upload an appropriate picture of the lychgate at St. George's in Beckenham. It is stated in this article in many places around the Web - including St. George's own site - that their lychgate is either "one of the oldest' or "possibly the oldest" in England. It dates back to the 13th century. I can't find a picture of the lychgate nor churchyard anywhere on the Web, public domain or otherwise. I'd love to take the picture myself, but I am not able to get across the pond in the forseeable future. 69.17.65.107 (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I was passing, so took one. Wheeltapper (talk) 20:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lychgate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Leiche Zunge

The German phrase mentioned in the "Name" section (btw. why not "Etymology"?) is bogus. There is no term "Leiche Zunge" with a supposed meaning of "medium" in German. It is not even correct German as such a word would be formed as a composite noun and use the plural of Leiche, thus "Leichenzunge". However, this doesn't make it a real word. The German language very much lends itself to having speakers make up real sounding words on the spot. To be fair, I actually found a single use of the word "Leichenzunge" with a rough meaning of "medium" in a penny dreadful fantasy novel about vampires but the more common occurrence is in press reports about medical science/procedures where Leichenzunge literally means tongue of a corpse (things on the line of "Cancer patient speaks again with a corpse's tongue" they meant donor, but this way it sounded cooler, it was not very high quality journalism). This all aside, that little (bogus) trivia is completely irrelevant for the article. If nobody contests I'll remove that part. NorPhi (talk) 15:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Use

The first paragraph is without citations, and is a mix of supposition and error. I feel the information presented below it is more appropriate. Unless someone objects, I'll remove that part. HeritageNL (talk) 23:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.