Talk:List of program music
Are the two Brahms pieces listed - the Tragic Overture and the Academic Festival Overture - really pieces of program music? The former has some vague notion of
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
Are the two Brahms pieces listed - the Tragic Overture and the Academic Festival Overture - really pieces of program music? The former has some vague notion of being "tragic", as the title suggests, but there's nothing more specific to it than that, as far as I know. The latter just quotes a few drinking songs, it doesn't even have a vague notion behind it, does it? Or is there more to this than I'm aware? --Camembert
- Maybe I was reaching. Now that I think about it, Brahms is a lot less programmatic than even Bruckner! Dmetric 20:01, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)
How is Beethoven's Sonatina in F program music? --Stratford15 21:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I would have expected Holts' The Planets to be listed here. --GreggSaffell (talk) 12:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Ravel and Debussy wrote almost entirely in this style, I'm shocked Ravel has so little on his list and completely astonished that Debussy isn't even listed. I don't think anyone could argue that pieces such as "A Boat on the Ocean", "The Valley of Bells", the rest of the Miroirs suite or everything that Debussy wrote (eg. Reflections in the Water) aren't program music... Look Busy (talk) 21:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed. A list of the Debussy works that are not program music would be shorter than a list of those that are. -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 21:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.