Talk:List of optimization software
Dear all,
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of optimization software article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Spurious remove of Google OR-Tools
Dear all,
May I know:
- Why Google OR-Tools (Apache 2.0) has been removed from this page ("Free and open-source software"/"Software libraries") by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_optimization_software&diff=prev&oldid=859952944 ?
- How to bring it back to the list ?
- There is a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Developers#OR_Tools should we create a dedicated page instead ? (e.g. like COIN-OR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COIN-OR)
Thanks !
ps: Google OSS Release Engineer here... Mizux (talk) 12:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is a list of 'notable optimization software'. On Wikipedia notable in this context means 'has a preexisting Wikipedia article.' - MrOllie (talk) 12:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- So creating such page would make OR-Tools a "notable optimization software" ? Mizux (talk) 12:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- If the required sources exist. But see WP:PAID and WP:COI, if you were to do this certain disclosures would be required by Wikipedia's terms of use. - MrOllie (talk) 12:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, looking at some of your other edits you're probably already in violation of the ToU, so you should look into that either way. - MrOllie (talk) 13:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- If the required sources exist. But see WP:PAID and WP:COI, if you were to do this certain disclosures would be required by Wikipedia's terms of use. - MrOllie (talk) 12:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Solvers vs. Application Software
The lists of proprietary and freeware software products contain both solvers (e.g. MOSEK, CPLEX) and languages and software using those for more or less of an application (e.g. OptimJ or TOMLAB which may use MOSEK and CPLEX, as well as software products that don't disclose which solver they use). Would there be any merit in breaking the lists up or creating a table? NerdNaut (talk) 13:33, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.