Talk:List of fictional fish
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of fictional fish article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Inconsistent categories
The way the list is categorized doesn't make any sense. Why is Lilo & Stitch in the Film category while Finding Nemo is in Animation? Why are the categories Animation, Film, and TV Series? If we are categorizing based on whether it was animated or not then the categories ought to be Animation and Live Action regardless of whether it's a movie, a short, a direct-to-video, or TV series. On the other hand if we are categorizing based on length and whether it was shown as a series on TV or as a feature length movie in theatres, then it doesn't matter whether it is animated or not. As it is, the inconsistent categories are confusing, e.g., since Lilo & Stitch is not in the Animation category does it imply that it's not an animated movie? If Finding Nemo is not in the Film category does it imply that it was not a movie? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.195.117.185 (talk) 20:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Jaws
What? No Jaws? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.